Three Things to Know About Just-Released Proposed CFIUS Rules
The new rules would expand requirements for review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, the interagency panel, to include minority stakes in investments in more industries and additional real estate transactions, under the law enacted by Congress last year.
September 17, 2019 at 07:24 PM
4 minute read
This story has been updated.
More proposed regulations implementing the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act, affecting investments by foreign entities in U.S. companies, were released Tuesday by the Treasury Department for comment.
The new rules would expand requirements for review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, the interagency panel, to include minority stakes in investments in more industries and additional real estate transactions, under the law enacted by Congress last year.
"U.S. companies need to be aware of their business activities that are covered by these new rules in anticipation of receipt of any future investment from foreign investors. For foreign investors in the U.S., they need to be aware not only of the business activities of their U.S. targets but of where the U.S. businesses in which they are investing are located, because the U.S. government continues to demonstrate increasing interest in scrutinizing international transactions in the interest of national security," said Wiley Rein international trade, national security and telecom partner Richard C. Sofield, former director of the foreign investment review staff for the National Security Division at the U.S. Department of Justice.
The new rules would apply broadly but CFIUS is looking to build in exceptions for certain countries, he said. The deadline for written comments is Oct. 17, according to the Treasury Department notice.
Briefly, here are three things to know about the new proposed rules:
- CFIUS is expanding jurisdiction to cover investments that are less than controlling investments in technology, infrastructure and data companies, collectively known as TID businesses. It is lowering the threshold level of investment in these three types of transactions to assert jurisdiction over more transactions.
- CFIUS is requiring mandatory filings for certain investments in which a foreign government has a "substantial interest," and it is extending its jurisdiction to cover a broad swath of real estate transactions. Any investment by a sovereign wealth fund, for example, a government-owned entity.
- CFIUS will apply to a broad swath of certain real estate transactions. Before it was mainly proximity issues. Transactions that are part of air or maritime ports within "close proximity" of military installations or "extended range" of certain military installations and within certain geographic areas associated with missile fields and offshore ranges are included.
According to an alert posted by Arent Fox partner David Hanke, the new rules also apply with respect to real estate if a parcel "meets one of three specific criteria in relation to a U.S. military installation or other U.S. government facility that is 'sensitive for reasons relating to national security.' These criteria are that the real estate: Is in 'close proximity' to that installation or facility; could enable foreign intelligence collection on activities conducted there; or could otherwise expose national security activities there to risk of foreign surveillance."
The Treasury Department previously released guidance for dealmakers on new CFIUS regulations concerning investment funds exceptions under its Critical Technology Pilot Program introduced in November 2018.
Partner Christian Davis at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld in Washington, D.C. summarized: "The proposed regulations reflect CFIUS's effort to implement the FIRRMA mandate while taking into consideration both national security and business concerns. The result is a much more complex regulatory regime that investors and businesses will need to unravel."
Read More:
CFIUS Issues More Guidance for Dealmakers, Lawyers Say
CFIUS Rules for Critical Infrastructure Are Coming, and They're Not What You Think
CFIUS Arms Race Heats Up With Hires at V&E, Linklaters, Norton Rose Fulbright
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Testing Legal Authority, Trump Fires NLRB Member, Leaving Panel Without Quorum
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Importance of Federal Rule of Evidence 502 and Its Impact on Privilege
- 2What’s at Stake in Supreme Court Case Over Religious Charter School?
- 3People in the News—Jan. 30, 2025—Rubin Glickman, Goldberg Segalla
- 4Georgia Republicans Push to Limit Lawsuits. But Would That Keep Insurance Rates From Rising?
- 5Trending Issues in Florida Construction Law That Attorneys Need to Be Aware Of
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250