Mylan Agrees to Pay $30M to Settle SEC Charges Connected With DOJ EpiPen Probe
Without admitting or denying the SEC's allegations, Mylan, headquartered in the Netherlands with U.S. operations based in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, agreed to the entry of a final judgment ordering a $30 million penalty and permanently enjoining it from violating sections of the Securities Act of 1933 and Securitiies Exchange Act of 1934.
September 27, 2019 at 01:31 PM
4 minute read
Mylan NV, manufacturer of the lifesaving allergy medication EpiPen, has agreed to pay $30 million in fines to settle charges by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that the company misled investors by making false accounting statements and disclosures about a Justice Department probe into whether the company had overcharged Medicaid by hundreds of millions of dollars, the SEC announced Friday.
Without admitting or denying the SEC's allegations, Mylan, headquartered in the Netherlands with U.S. operations based in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, agreed to the entry of a final judgment ordering a $30 million penalty and permanently enjoining it from violating sections of the Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
"Mylan believes at this time, taking all other matters into consideration, that this settlement is the right course of action for the Company. The Company continues to be committed to the highest levels of integrity with respect to all aspects of its business operations, including its public filing disclosures and communications with investors," the company said in a statement Friday.
In its complaint filed in federal district court in Washington, D.C., the SEC alleged that Mylan had misclassified EpiPen, its most profitable product, which treats anaphylactic shock, as a generic drug under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program instead of as a branded drug, resulting in much lower rebates to the federal government. According to the complaint, the company had raised the price of the drug more than 500% during the period during which the company was misclassifying it as generic, but failed to pay the additional rebates to the federal government.
The complaint alleges that in October 2014 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services informed Mylan that EpiPen was misclassified, and that starting the following month and for nearly two years after, the Justice Department conducted a civil probe into the matter. During the investigation, the DOJ issued multiple subpoenas and demands, and rejected Mylan's attempts to close the investigation. It also informed Mylan of its intent to sue if the company didn't make a settlement offer and the company produced documents to the department including potential damages calculations and settlement offers, according to the complaint.
But the SEC alleges in the complaint that Mylan failed to disclose or account for financial losses from the DOJ's investigation in its public filings until October 2016, when the company finally announced a $465 million settlement with the DOJ.
As a result, the SEC charged that Mylan's public SEC filings for investors were false and misleading and that its 2014 and 2015 risk factor disclosures were inaccurate because they stated that a government authority "may" take a contrary position on its Medicaid submissions, when in fact the CMS had already informed the company that EpiPen was misclassified.
Antonia Chion, associate director in the SEC's division of enforcement said in a statement: "As alleged in our complaint, investors were kept in the dark about Mylan's EpiPen misclassification and the potential loss Mylan faced as a result of the pending investigations into the misclassification. It is critical that public companies accurately disclose material business risks and timely disclose and account for loss contingencies that can materially affect their bottom line."
The SEC's investigation was conducted by Ian Dattner and Daniel Maher, under the supervision of Lisa Deitch, Peter Rosario and Antonia Chion.
Brian Roman is general counsel for Mylan, which did not respond to a request for comment. Mylan is represented by Debevoise & Plimpton, which also did not respond to a comment request.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
FTC, DOJ Withdrawal of Antitrust Guidelines for Collaboration Infuriates Republicans
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250