Uncertainty May Keep Legal Operations Out of Small to Midsize Legal Departments
Only 23% of those in small to midsize legal departments said they believed their legal departments would benefit by hiring a legal operations professional, according to a report by Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory and Priori.
September 27, 2019 at 05:26 PM
3 minute read
Only 23% of those in small to midsize legal departments said they believed their legal departments would benefit by hiring a legal operations professional, which shows lingering uncertainty about legal operations, according to a report by Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory and Priori published this week.
The respondents included 176 members of the Association of Corporate Counsel. Eighty-eight percent of respondents were based in the United States.
"The general theme overall is uncertainty," Brian Kudowitz, a portfolio director at Wolters Kluwer, said Friday.
Kudowitz said the beginning of a legal operations function should be with data that will show business leaders where efficiencies can be achieved.
"You have to make a case, at the end of the day, of what the priority is," Kudowitz explained. "Most of the resistance in getting this started comes from looking like you're trying to bite off too much."
He said legal departments hoping to implement legal operations should focus on one thing first and show the business where it is going to get a return on the investment in legal operations or legal technology.
However, one of the issues for smaller and midsize legal departments, said Basha Rubin, CEO and co-founder of Priori, is they do not know which data they have or how to utilize it.
"I think that many smaller legal departments are operating in the dark about what their data is," Rubin said.
Legal departments can often get caught up in the allure of new technology without fully understanding it. Kudowitz said those attorneys who may be buying legal technology should do due diligence and make sure it is the right fit for their goals.
"I think you have to take the tough customer approach to make sure your vendors understand your needs and to make sure [the technology] is being implemented the right way," Kudowitz said.
Rubin said she knew of someone who spent the majority of the day undoing an artificial intelligence contract because that person could not use it.
"The boss had met the company's founders at a conference and they hadn't done a deep dive on the product," Rubin said. "They put this tool in place during a legal operations push and that caused a lot of blowback."
The report shows that 59% of respondents have some kind of legal operations function within their legal department. Rubin and Kudowitz said this is a good sign for the future of legal operations in small to midsize legal departments.
"I think [there will be] more smaller legal departments who are bringing on legal operations functions," Rubin said.
"In the next couple of years, some of these [legal operations] people will move around which will create a cross-pollination effect," Kudowitz said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250