FTC Opens Probe Into E-Cigarette Marketing, Demands Information From 6 Manufacturers
The Federal Trade Commission announced Thursday that it had demanded reports from six e-cigarette manufacturers about their sales, promotion and advertising practices.
October 03, 2019 at 06:47 PM
4 minute read
In the latest trouble for the vaping industry, the Federal Trade Commission announced Thursday that it has opened an investigation into the marketing practices of six e-cigarette manufacturers.
The companies are Fontem US, a subsidiary of Imperial Brands; Juul Labs Inc., part-owned by Altria; Logic Technology Development LLC; NJOY LLC; Nu Mark LLC and R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co.
The FTC is demanding the companies to provide it with written reports and data files "concerning the sales, practices and methods of advertising," in their vaping products from 2015 through 2018. The agency wants to see whether the companies targeted minors in that period, after a huge increase in e-cigarette popularity in recent years among young people was reported by the U.S. surgeon general as well as a rising number of reports of adverse health effects among users of vaping products.
As of Oct. 1, 1,080 lung injury cases associated with using e-cigarette or vaping products had been reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from 48 states and one U.S. territory, with 18 confirmed deaths, according to a CDC release posted on Thursday.
The commission is demanding annual data on sales and giveaways of e-cigarettes and liquids, the characteristics of products, including their flavors; the amount of money companies spent on promotion and product placement and websites and social media accounts; the money they spent on ads and affiliate programs, influencer marketing and college campus promotions, among other things.
Gregory Conley, an attorney who is a spokesman for the American Vaping Association, a nonprofit advocacy group based in Connecticut, said: "The FTC is unlikely to learn anything new from this investigation, as multiple state attorneys general, the FDA and Congress have all thoroughly examined the marketing practices of Juul. As for the other five companies, none of them has anything to worry about as all of their past marketing has been largely unobjectionable with some minor exceptions that are unlikely to rise to the level that would allow for the FTC to take enforcement action against anyone."
The FTC probe comes as the Food and Drug Administration, state attorneys general and cities are also ramping up investigations and enacting restrictions on the marketing of e-cigarettes and other vaping products amid a rising number of users and increased reports of illnesses.
In early September, the FDA sent a letter to the chief executive officer and chief legal officer Jerry Masoudi demanding the company amend its advertising statements, including that its products were "much safer than cigarettes." Juul CEO Kevin Burns stepped down from office on Sept. 25 amid criticism and announced it would cease advertising.
Also last month, citing the regulatory challenges, Walmart Inc. announced it would cease selling e-cigarettes and vaping products at its Walmart and Sam's Club stores, a decision that elicited criticism from the American Vaping Association because the stores continue to sell combustible tobacco products. Some of the illnesses reported have been associated with vaping of cannabis products as well as nicotine products.
New York's Flavored Vaping Ban Put on Hold by State Appeals Court
Amid Vaping Illness Investigation, Juul CEO Steps Down
Vaping Group Sues FDA to Push Back Application Deadline, Establish Guidelines for Companies
Under a Legal Cloud, Juul Jostles Over Which Judge Should Decide Lawsuits
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDOT Moves to Roll Back Emissions Rules, Eliminate DEI Programs
Trump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 2Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 3Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 4Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
- 5Zoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250