Report: Manufacturing In-House Counsel Believe Regulation Is Becoming Increasingly Complex
Increasing regulation will require companies in the manufacturing sector to rely more on their legal departments to help with business strategy, according to a report published this week by Forbes Insights and K&L Gates.
October 11, 2019 at 06:12 PM
3 minute read
Increasing regulation will require companies in the manufacturing sector to rely more on their legal departments to help with business strategy, according to a report published this week by Forbes Insights and K&L Gates.
Forty-five percent of respondents believe that regulation is increasing in both volume and complexity. Rick Giovannelli, a partner at K&L Gates in Charlotte, North Carolina, said manufacturing companies are now finding that investing in legal is critical to business because of the complexity of new regulations.
"By involving their legal teams earlier and more thoroughly into their strategic and ops functions, many companies are realizing that an ounce of regulatory prevention is worth a pound of cure," Giovannelli said.
Despite the quantity and complexity of legal issues facing the manufacturing sector, only 39% of respondents indicated that legal matters are in the top five considerations when deciding on a growth strategy.
Giovannelli said he views the 39% as growth. He said most companies have moved past the idea that the legal department is "the department of no."
"Lawyers can be most effective at finding those solutions when they are deeply involved in setting, or at least hearing, the company's strategic plans and those plans take legal and regulatory matters into account on the front end," Giovannelli said.
Successful general counsel and chief legal officers may have instilled a culture where their departments help business executives find solutions to business problems, Giovannelli said. However, he said some old habits "die hard" and in some cases, legal problems are still siloed.
Some of those regulations include new laws such as the California Consumer Privacy Act and the General Data Protection Regulation that manufacturing companies must consider.
"The increasing volume and complexity of regulations is especially prevalent in privacy as companies who are just now catching their breath from the race to comply with GDPR now have to lace up those same shoes again with CCPA coming online in the near future," Giovannelli said.
He said regulations surrounding smart devices that manufacturers create themselves or use in their own operations will become more complicated because there does not seem to be a uniform solution coming anytime soon.
"Without a federal solution in place, this creates a dizzying array of state-by-state regulations that will require significant compliance resources," Giovannelli said.
Although data privacy and protection is a hot news topic, only 32% of those surveyed believe the digitization of the manufacturing sector is the most relevant issue from a legal point of view.
The data in the report is based on responses to a survey of 200 U.S.-based legal and nonlegal executives from the manufacturing sector. Twenty-five percent of the survey respondents were chief legal officers, general counsel or other top legal officers. Eighty-eight percent of the respondents came from companies with revenues of $1 billion or more.
The manufacturing segments represented in the survey were aerospace and defense products, automotive, engineering, metals, consumer products, conglomerates and transportation, and logistics.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKraft Heinz Hires GC of Industrial Manufacturer as Legal Chief
Lennox Hires 12-Year Company Veteran as CLO, Bucking Hire-From-Outside Trend
3 minute readMastercard CLO Exits After Just 14 Months, Takes Legal Reins of Laser Manufacturer
3 minute readPhotronics GC Placed on Leave in June Departs—With Company Paying an Extra Year of Salary
Trending Stories
- 1The Year That Was
- 2Employment Law Changes Expected From Second Trump Administration
- 3Decision of the Day: Sri Lanka Granted Stay of Litigation Over Defaulted Sovereign Bond Debt
- 4AI Adoption, Data Center Building Boom Opening More Doors for Cybercriminals, Many of Them Teenagers
- 5Mayor's Advisory Committee To Hold Hearing on Fitness of Judicial Candidates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250