Haunted by the Past, Wells Fargo Takes $1.6B Legal Charge
In a financial report that shows general counsel and interim CEO Allen Parker is still struggling mightily to overcome Wells Fargo & Co.'s past scandals, the bank is taking a $1.6 billion charge for legal costs that caught some observers by surprise.
October 16, 2019 at 04:53 PM
4 minute read
In a financial report that shows general counsel and interim CEO Allen Parker is still struggling mightily to overcome Wells Fargo & Co.'s past scandals, the bank is taking a $1.6 billion charge for legal costs that caught some observers by surprise.
The Oct. 15 Wells Fargo quarterly earnings report, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, showed a whopping $1.8 billion increase in noninterest expenses over last quarter. The increase was driven mainly by $1.7 billion surge in operating losses, including the legal charge, along with $823 million paid for outside professional services, such as outside counsel and consultants.
A bank spokesman Tuesday declined to name the key law firms and payment amounts involved.
The bank's quarterly operating losses include "litigation accruals for a variety of matters, including a $1.6 billion discrete litigation accrual for previously disclosed retail sales practices matters." Exactly what that accrual will pay for is not yet clear. It could be for compliance efforts, or for future resolutions with regulators, or settlements with plaintiffs in numerous pending lawsuits, or all of the above.
The "retail sales matters" wording primarily refers to the 2016 fake account scandal, when the bank made money creating accounts for customers that they didn't ask for.
Details of the litigation following the fake account scandal are contained in the bank's previous quarterly report filed Aug. 2. This report also includes several other lesser, but more recent, scandals.
The bank has reached financial settlements with all the state attorneys general over the fake accounts scandal, but remains under investigation by the SEC, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Labor Department. The latter concerns the treatment of employees who were fired over the scandal.
It also has signed consent orders with the several other regulators. A key one, the Federal Reserve Board, has placed an ongoing cap on the bank's assets until the Federal Reserve is satisfied with Wells Fargo's efforts to enhance its corporate governance and board oversight.
Parker was hired as general counsel in 2017 to bring the bank through the crisis, settle the litigation and calm its relationships with regulators. He has served as interim CEO for the past six months until a new chief executive arrives Oct. 21, when he will return to the general counsel role.
Parker didn't agree to a Corporate Counsel request for an interview Tuesday, but his spokesman referred to statements made during the Oct. 15 earnings call with investors.
During the call, several analysts expressed surprise and disappointment at the $1.6 billion increase for legal costs. Some hoped it meant that settlements with the government are near.
Eric Compton, an equity analyst with Morningstar Inc., asked Parker if the bank was "getting toward the light at the end of the tunnel [on the scandal]. Should we start to see this—the legal reserve estimate—start to trend down?"
Parker responded, "As you know, we don't provide information as to the portion of our reserves that's allocable to any particular litigation or other items. And with regard to the DOJ and SEC investigations that began in 2016, we really don't have any update beyond what we said in our prepared remarks and what we previously disclosed in our last quarter 10-Q. Our discussions with the DOJ and SEC are ongoing. And when we have more information to disclose, we'll, of course, do so."
But a statement in the filing suggests the noninterest expense category might begin to taper off by the end of the fourth quarter. So far in the first three quarters of 2019 the company has logged roughly $42.5 billion on noninterest expense, including legal costs, or an average of about $14 billion per quarter.
The statement said the full year 2019 noninterest expense is expected to be about $53 billion, or about $13 billion for the quarter. But that number "excludes annual operating losses in excess of $600 million, such as litigation and remediation accruals and penalties," according to the report.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute read'We’re Here to Empower People to Make Good Decisions': Why Compliance Chiefs Must Learn to Think Like a Businessperson
Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250