Panel: Without Legalization, Banks Still Take Risk Accepting Cash From Cannabis Industry
Until marijuana is no longer a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act or exceptions to the law are passed, banks will still be taking a risk when it comes to providing financial services for cannabis companies, a panel at the Minority Corporate Counsel Association's 2019 Creating Pathways to Diversity Conference in New York said Wednesday.
October 16, 2019 at 02:25 PM
3 minute read
Until marijuana is no longer a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act or exceptions to the federal law are passed, banks will still be taking a risk when it comes to providing financial services for cannabis companies, a panel at the Minority Corporate Counsel Association's 2019 Creating Pathways to Diversity Conference in New York said Wednesday.
Steve Shine, vice president and corporate counsel at Prudential Financial Inc., said without legislation protecting banks from criminal liability, the industry will remain a cash business.
"You're creating an economy that is separate and apart from the U.S. banking system," Shine said.
If federally regulated banks do choose to do business with cannabis companies or conduct business with companies that service the cannabis industry, they may still face federal criminal charges, Shine explained.
"Proceeds from the sale of marijuana—even though legal in certain states—it is proceeds of a crime under federal law," Shine said.
He said financial institutions that accept those proceeds could face money laundering charges, which is why many larger financial institutions have not agreed to work with cannabis companies or their contractors such as companies that provide packaging or build grow houses.
"We have those issues not just with the folks who touch the plant, but some of the related businesses," Shine said.
In 2013, the Cole Memo was published and written by then-attorney general James M. Cole. The memo said the Department of Justice was not going to spend resources prosecuting cannabis companies in states where it is legal. The Cole Memo was rescinded in 2018, by then-attorney general Jeff Sessions. However, Guillermo Artiles, a partner at McCarter & English in Newark, New Jersey, said on the panel that federal prosecutions of cannabis companies have decreased.
Many companies still operate under the spirit of the Cole Memo. However, the memo did not give banks the green light to accept proceeds from legal cannabis sales.
"It also didn't protect banks from federal banking regulators," Daniel Kim, assistant general counsel, global financial crimes legal at JPMorgan Chase & Co., said of the memo.
One of the bills that have passed the House and is pending in the Senate, Artiles said, is the Secure And Fair Enforcement Banking Act, or SAFE Banking Act. The legislation would provide a safe harbor for national banks and insurance companies to accept funds from cannabis companies, although it would not legalize marijuana at the federal level.
Artiles said he thinks if the bill passes in the Senate, President Donald Trump will sign it.
"He can comfortably say to his base that 'this wasn't a marijuana bill, this was a banking bill,'" Artiles said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCorporate Counsel's 2024 Award Winners Performed Legal Wizardry, Gave a Hand Up to Others
'We’re Here to Empower People to Make Good Decisions': Why Compliance Chiefs Must Learn to Think Like a Businessperson
High-Flying Genetics Testing Firm GeneDx Hires Ex-Zoetis GC as Legal Chief
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
- 3Morgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
- 4Thursday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250