Gun Safety Group Sues to Reveal Gun Lobbyists' Communications With US Government
"The public has a right to know what these public records contain," Everytown's in-house counsel Eric Tirschwell told Corporate Counsel on Thursday.
October 17, 2019 at 03:13 PM
4 minute read
Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund, a nonpartisan gun safety group, has filed a Freedom of Information Act suit seeking records of U.S. government employees' communications with the National Rifle Association of America and other gun lobbyists after the mass shooting at a high school in Parkland, Florida, last year.
The federal suit, filed Oct. 16, states, "The requested records will shed light on topics of vital national importance. Everytown seeks to learn the extent to which the DOJ's policy choices are informed or influenced by gun lobby access to government decision-makers, and why certain gun safety initiatives have been abandoned."
It alleges that the U.S. Department of Justice has failed to produce the records in response to 18 months of requests from Everytown. The Justice Department, which usually does not talk about ongoing litigation, did not immediately return messages seeking comment.
"The public has a right to know what these public records contain," Everytown's in-house counsel Eric Tirschwell told Corporate Counsel on Thursday. Tirschwell oversees 13 litigators as managing director of litigation and national enforcement policy at Everytown Law, the litigation arm of the support fund.
Tirschwell said, "The Trump administration's choices on gun policy have major consequences for public safety, and the public deserves to know the extent to which the gun lobby is influencing those choices."
The suit also seeks records pertaining to the abandonment of gun violence prevention initiatives that were launched during the Obama administration.
The suit alleges, "DOJ's failure to provide any substantive response about whether or not it will comply with Everytown's requests, which have been pending for a year and a half, serves to constructively exhaust Everytown's administrative remedies." In other words, Everytown cannot appeal the Justice Department decision, if so desired, until a decision is issued.
The suit details numerous contacts between Everytown and the department offering to narrow the scope of the requests and to take other measures to expedite production, but so far to no avail.
Everytown is asking the court to:
- Order the Justice Department to disclose the records requested.
- Set a schedule for producing requested records to Everytown.
- Award Everytown its costs and reasonable attorney's fees.
- Expedite the proceeding.
The suit was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by Everytown lawyers Alla Lefkowitz and Aaron Esty, based in New York.
They were joined in the complaint by Murad Hussain, a partner in the Washington, D.C., office of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, and other attorneys from the law firm. Hussain said he would let the complaint speak for itself.
Everytown Law calls itself the "largest team of litigators in the country dedicated full-time to advocating to advance gun safety in the courts and through the criminal and civil justice systems."
In ongoing litigation around the country, it is challenging gun laws it considers dangerous, defending gun safety laws in Second Amendment and preemption challenges, and representing survivors of gun violence seeking accountability and reform.
In an August ruling in a separate lawsuit, Everytown Law won a major federal court decision that overturned the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives' refusal to produce data from its firearms tracing database. The decision is the first federal court decision to hold that a 2003 congressional appropriations law known as the Tiahrt Rider cannot be used to withhold data under the Freedom of Information Act.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute readEx-Cancer Society CLO Takes Legal Reins of Habitat for Humanity International
3 minute read$17B Episcopal Church Pension Fund Hires New Legal Chief as Staff Changes Continue
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250