NLRB General Counsel Wants All Case Documents E-Filed by Jan. 21
The National Labor Relations Board general counsel Peter Robb has issued a memo requiring all documents submitted in cases before the agency to be filed electronically on the agency's website.
October 22, 2019 at 07:14 PM
3 minute read
The National Labor Relations Board is following the lead of federal courts on e-filing. General counsel Peter Robb has issued a memo requiring all documents submitted in cases before the agency to be filed electronically on the agency's website.
The Monday memo instructs all regions to no longer accept documents emailed directly to agency personnel, as had been done in the past.
Lori Armstrong Halber, employment law partner in Reed Smith's Philadelphia and Princeton, New Jersey, offices, told Corporate Counsel on Tuesday that most major companies and their counsel are familiar with e-filing.
Smaller companies and smaller unions, she said, may not be as familiar with the process and will need more time to adjust.
The e-filing requirement is effective immediately, the memo said, but all agency offices were told to allow a 90-day grace period to accommodate parties adjusting to the transition.
The deadline when paper, fax and emails will no longer be accepted is Jan. 21.
Halber said the labor board "is in some ways behind the times, since all federal courts have had e-fling for some time."
The main benefit for her, she said, is she gains more filing time if a deadline is tight. Normally, she explained, a filing is due in the office by close of business. But e-filing allows attorneys to file until midnight.
Robb's office declined comment, but his memo explains the benefits for the agency. "Electronic filing provides a streamlined procedure by which documents received by the agency will be placed and stored in the appropriate files automatically, [ensuring] both the integrity and accuracy of regional office case files," it says.
The memo says the automated filing will reduce the time spent by regional office employees on scanning or making sure that documents are in the appropriate case file. The process also will allow employees to devote more time to substantive case-handling matters, Robb wrote.
Exceptions to the rule include filing of unfair labor practice charges or petitions in representation proceedings. In those two cases, parties have a choice between e-filing, or continuing to use regular mail, personal delivery or fax.
The agency posted instructions for e-filing on its website.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRepublican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
4 minute readDemocratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
7 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250