QuisLex General Counsel on Outsourcing Legal Work
David Klein discusses how he has changed the way firms outsource legal work and helped businesses better understand how QuisLex plays an important part in the corporate world.
November 01, 2019 at 01:00 AM
3 minute read
The attitudes of outsourcing legal work have changed since QuisLex general counsel David Klein worked in firms. Now, law firms have a better understanding of the place companies like QuisLex play in the corporate world. Aside from his role as the sole in-house attorney at QuisLex, he also helps the company close corporate deals. Klein spoke to Corporate Counsel about his dual role at QuisLex, the evolution of outsourcing legal services, the future of QuisLex and the place outsourcing legal has in the corporate world.
What is involved in your role as GC of QuisLex? A lot of my responsibility at QuisLex involves negotiating the company's contracts, as well as keeping up changes in the law and in particular data privacy law. Two years ago it was the [General Data Protection Regulation] and most recently the [California Consumer Privacy Act] coming online in California. Because of my background, I wear two hats here, which includes helping sell and close corporate matters because I've got such familiarity with corporate transactions. My background is right to make it easier for me and the company to connect with in-house legal counsel and law firm partners.
How has QuisLex's business model changed since it started? In a lot of respects, the business has changed. In the early days, it was a lot about document review and government investigations. Over the last five to 10 years a lot of that work has shifted into corporate work in terms of drafting and negotiating contracts, compliance, legal operations, mergers and acquisitions and most recently data privacy.
Where do you see the company going in the next five to 10 years? I think there is going to be an emphasis on growing some new and more complex work. What's happening is companies are beginning to outsource more complex agreements and more complex transactions. The same thing is happening even on the litigation side where we're being asked to manage elements of litigation- or investigation-related work. I think we are moving up the food chain and as we move up the food chain the issues will become more complicated. The real change I think is a morphing of what we do into additional services like privacy-related services. They're similar to document review in that they often involve reviewing large numbers of documents, but they often require a different skill set and a different understanding of the law.
Have attitudes toward outsourcing changed since you started at QuisLex?
I think what's happened is that there is acceptance of outsourcing on a much wider scale. When companies like ours started doing document review, there was a lot of pushback in the industry primarily from law firms who maybe felt threatened by our business model. It's been long since the acceptance of our services were achieved in that space. I think what we're seeing now is much more widespread acceptance of the fact that legal outsourcing is going to be a growing part of the corporate world in the coming years.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech
7 minute readLegal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Trump Taps McKinsey CLO Pierre Gentin for Commerce Department GC
- 2Critical Mass With Law.com's Amanda Bronstad: 700+ Residents Near Ohio Derailment File New Suit, Is the FAA to Blame For Last Month's Air Disasters?
- 3Law Journal Column on Marital Residence Sales in Pending Divorces Puts 'Misplaced' Reliance on Two Cases
- 4A Message to the Community: Meeting the Moment in 2025
- 5Ex-Prosecutor Denies on Witness Stand That She Tried to Protect Ahmaud Arbery's Killers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250