Think Career Security, Not Job Security
Career security is about access to decision-makers, and your inside counsel counterparts control millions of dollars in outside counsel spend.
November 04, 2019 at 12:29 PM
3 minute read
The key ingredient to law firm success and security is, of course, client development. The "800 pound gorilla" with a major book of business calls the shots.
Success in a law department does not require rainmaking. However, inside counsel don't enjoy the same kind of ownership job security. They are vulnerable to mergers, leadership changes, bankruptcies, etc.
Most of our readers fully appreciate this dynamic, and are probably expecting me to pontificate now on the merits of networking in case you need or want to change corporate employers. Well, sort of.
I challenge you to think about this oft-covered topic differently, from the perspective of owning your future if necessary. You are in position now to build peer-to-peer relationships with other inside counsel in a way that law firm rainmakers can only envy. You can establish rapport with your counterparts at other companies in a context free of sales and expectations.
Consider this hypothetical: You are in your early 50s, you hold an Assistant General Counsel title, your company is acquired and your position is eliminated. You think you will easily land a similar or better position with another law department. You may, that is clearly Plan A. But you may find that you are overqualified for the Senior Counsel level positions at which many companies prefer to hire. And you may find that you are underqualified or not competing effectively for leadership level roles. Job security is about supply, demand, and marketability … it's not fully in your control.
However, if you have built real relationships with other inside counsel (not just your co-workers down the hall!), then you have power in what might otherwise feel like a powerless situation. Career security is about access to decision-makers, and your inside counsel counterparts control millions of dollars in outside counsel spend. Great contacts plus a business plan equal a soft and potentially lucrative landing when needed with a name brand law firm.
Let's first assume you have done the networking part: You have friends and peers at other companies with whom you have broken bread, shared best practices, and stayed in touch. Perhaps you have even spent time attending or speaking at one of the many inside counsel focused legal conferences. You have contacts and credibility.
Choose your law firm prospects based on the likely needs of your contacts, and not simply based on who you know. If those overlap, great, but it's not required. When presented with a promising business plan heavy on contact list names, many high quality law firms will listen. Propose a compensation package heavy on incentives. Bet on yourself. The lower the guaranteed draw or base salary, the more patience the law firm will have in supporting your client development efforts. Because even with great contacts and credibility, it will take time to turn relationships into engagements. Join a law firm that will invest in you the right way; this means a marketing allowance and the support of professionals who can offer coaching on how to turn your past into business for the future.
Mike Evers recruits attorneys for corporate legal departments throughout the United States. Visit www.everslegal.com. His firm also offers experienced in-house counsel to companies on an adjunct basis.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![AI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings AI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/c5/c5/75ff44a9441ba48050d3241762df/lawtech-767x633.jpg)
AI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute read![A Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs A Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2024/11/Legal-Tools1-767x633-2.jpg)
A Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute read![Election Risk Preparedness: Are General Counsel Ready? (Part 2) Election Risk Preparedness: Are General Counsel Ready? (Part 2)](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2024/10/Divided-Americans-767x633-2.jpg)
![Three Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity Three Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2024/10/Teamwork-767x633-1.jpg)
Three Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
- 1Big Law's Middle East Bet: Will It Pay Off?
- 2'Translate Across Disciplines': Paul Hastings’ New Tech Transactions Leader
- 3Milbank’s Revenue and Profits Surge Following Demand Increases Across the Board
- 4Fourth Quarter Growth in Demand and Worked Rates Coincided with Countercyclical Dip, New Report Indicates
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250