Five Ways Legal Technology Can Help Navigate Knowledge Management
Legal technology provides several advantages to firms, giving them the ability to capture legal knowledge, collaborate with colleagues and share knowledge and opinions in real time.
November 05, 2019 at 12:59 PM
5 minute read
One of a corporate lawyer's top jobs is to help their clients navigate the complexity of law in order to obtain the best possible outcome for their business. In doing so, the goal is to exceed client expectations by achieving knowledge management efficiencies that allow you to share that same legal experience internally and with your clients. The most successful of these firms are reaching a point of collaboration that arms colleagues with the ability to share their experience across teams to enhance value throughout their practice.
As a result, a gap is forming between these knowledge management industry leaders and those firms that have yet to crack the code on realizing efficiency in capturing and centralizing this critically important information. At the same time, these trailing firms remain challenged by many of the same things that knowledge management can solve. For instance, according to the Thomson Reuters 2019 State of U.S. Small Firms Report, "a large percentage, if not a majority of respondents in each firm-size classification expressed at least moderate concern about spending too much time on administrative tasks, controlling costs, keeping abreast of new tech, a lack of internal efficiency, keeping up with the competition, getting paid by their clients,and clients demanding "more for less" or pushing back on firm rates."
Each of these challenges can be addressed with effective knowledge management. That said, while the thought of catching up to a front runner in any area of business can be overwhelming, technology can position all firms to work smarter rather than harder with knowledge management, in particular.
Legal technology provides several advantages to firms, giving them the ability to capture legal knowledge, collaborate with colleagues and share knowledge and opinions in real time.
|Increased Efficiency
Regardless of how precisely focused the issue, there is an abundance of knowledge and data available today. This makes it nearly impossible for any one person to stay on top of all of it. Legal technology gives lawyers the ability to access existing knowledge in a single repository where all of the firm's know-how, data, files, tasks and activities are stored and managed.
As clients continue to demand faster service from firms, lawyers are in a position to respond by leveraging technology in a manner that allows its experience, work product and counsel to be immediately available to its clients. Using knowledge automation, for instance, firms can transform frequently used documents into intelligent templates that lawyers use and share internally. By automating document production and workflow, firms can save time and resources while simultaneously reducing risk and increasing accuracy.
|Increased Value to Clients
Knowledge management is key to a law firms' ability to deliver consistent and quality legal services while maintaining sustainable margins regardless of fee structure. Knowledge automation technology not only helps increase efficiency, which directly impacts margins, but also adds value to client relationships. By providing improved transparency, increased responsiveness and enhanced communications, firms are able to differentiate themselves and build client trust and confidence—each of which are encouraged by effective knowledge management systems.
|Delivery
An innovative approach to delivering legal services is becoming more and more critical to a firm's success and, in turn, a clients' satisfaction. With advancements being made in knowledge management, clients and law firms alike are improving productivity, risk management and client services. Firms are able to use automation to leverage know-how through quicker and more efficient access and deployment of information. In turn, this puts in-house counsel in a stronger position to report out on legal issues to their internal colleagues and leadership teams on a consistent basis.
|Lawyer Knowledge
A central location for knowledge management helps provide a framework for capturing, maintaining and sharing expertise that can benefit a firm in the same way a rising tide raises all ships. Whether in regard to positioning associates to fast-track their learning or protecting against the loss of knowledge due to the departure of a partner, a custom information repository for internal and external knowledge allows a firm's lawyers to easily search and manage know-how, saving time and money. Combined with AI and contextual search tools, search experiences are optimized to find content and knowledge that is most valuable to the lawyers.
|Risk Management
Ensuring compliance and mitigating risk can be among the top issues keeping law firm attorneys up at night. Lawyers need the ability to quickly and efficiently refer to previous matters and identify potential risks for clients. Knowledge management technology allows firms to address this need by leveraging relevant information in a way that streamlines compliance workflows across an entire firm.
By implementing legal technology with the intended purpose of strengthening knowledge management, firms are able to increase efficiency, maintain lawyer know-how, mitigate risk and deliver a more consistent and high quality level of counsel to clients. The capabilities of legal technology to do just that gives firms the ability to increase their value to clients and obtain the best possible outcome, while also maintaining a competitive edge on firms who are slower to embrace these best practices.
Sarah Leicester is global campaigns manager at HighQ, a collaboration software company that was acquired by Thomson Reuters in July. Leicester has spent her career helping companies leverage the strength of technology to help drive improved business value.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
11 minute readTrending Stories
- 1DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 2GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 3Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
- 4Warner Bros. Accused of Misleading Investors on NBA Talks
- 5FTC Settles With Security Firm Over AI Claims Under Agency's Compliance Program
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250