More Investment in Stressing Core Values, Ethics Can Mean Less Misconduct
More corporate investment in strengthening core values and ethical leadership can help reduce misconduct in the entire organization, according to a new business ethics report.
November 07, 2019 at 04:49 PM
4 minute read
More corporate investment in strengthening core values and ethical leadership can help reduce misconduct in the entire organization, according to a new business ethics report.
The 2019 Global Business Ethics Survey report released last week by the Ethics & Compliance Initiative also found that employees who work in organizations with a strong commitment to values and ethical leadership are less likely to feel pressure to compromise standards and are more likely to want to remain at their organization.
The Ethics & Compliance Initiative, based in Vienna, Virginia, is a nonprofit group that provides research and a best practice community to its members and their general counsel, as well as certification opportunities for ethics and compliance professionals.
CEO Pat Harned said the summary, "The Impact of Organizational Values and Ethical Leadership on Misconduct: A Global Look," is one of four reports based on the group's annual survey. This year's survey collected data from 18,000 employees based in 18 countries and asked about observed misconduct and the reporting of misconduct.
"We've been looking at organizational cultures for a very long time," said Harned, who has led the group for two decades. "This year we focused the survey on how employees perceive the culture in their own organization."
Harned said the data were consistent with past findings. On median scores, globally 39% of employees did not see a strong commitment to values in their organization, and 58% did not see a strong commitment to ethical leadership.
Broken into regions, the data show that Europe scored the worst on the commitment to values, with 48% saying their organizations were lacking. Africa and the Middle East had the best score at 33%.
More employees in the Asia Pacific region saw a lack of ethical leadership, at 67%, while only 47% in North America shared that perception.
The survey asked employees about observing three common types of company misconduct in the past 12 months: abusive behavior by managers, violations of health and safety regulations, and conflicts of interest. It then correlated their answers to that question with their perceptions of commitment levels.
About 60% of the employees were supervisors or above while 40% were non-management.
Not surprisingly, Harned said, employees who reported the weakest commitments to values and ethics also reported the highest observance of misconduct in their companies.
"When employees feel that their leaders are committed to the values of the organization then there is a significant difference in how often employees see wrongdoing," she explained.
She pointed out the report contains several tips for strengthening values and ethical leadership. They include:
- Leaders need to assume the role of ethical champions, talking about the importance of ethical conduct, referencing values as a framework for decisions and encouraging employees to speak up about issues.
- Leaders should act in accordance to organizational values and also need to be held accountable for their performance in relation to ethics and compliance.
- Employees' performance evaluations should include how their actions align with organizational values.
One corporate sponsor of this year's study was Walmart Inc., where CEO Doug McMillon exhibits traits cited in the report by openly talking about the company's values and unique culture.
In an introduction to the company's statement of ethics, McMillon wrote that it is "a daily resource for making honest, fair and objective decisions while operating in compliance with all laws and our policies … Through your ethical behavior and willingness to speak up for the highest standards, we earn and keep the trust of our customers, each other and our local communities."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute readEx-Cancer Society CLO Takes Legal Reins of Habitat for Humanity International
3 minute read$17B Episcopal Church Pension Fund Hires New Legal Chief as Staff Changes Continue
After Recasting ACC Into Global Enterprise, CEO Veta Richardson Plans 2025 Exit
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250