The CCPA Is Coming and So Are Data Breach Class Actions
Companies that do business in California can expect to see class action litigation if they become the victim of a data breach, but showing a good cybersecurity posture and implementing arbitration agreements may be the best defense.
November 08, 2019 at 06:09 PM
3 minute read
Companies that do business in California can expect to see class action litigation if they become the victim of a data breach, but showing a good cybersecurity posture and implementing arbitration agreements may be the best defense.
"I think those of us on the defense side are speculating over whether it's going to be [on] Jan. 1 or Jan. 2," Anne Johnson Palmer, a partner at Ropes & Gray in San Francisco, said. "Any company that experiences a data breach is likely to see one of these cases."
Since June 28, 2018, the California Consumer Privacy Act has undergone several changes. Most notably, consumers now only have a private right of action for a data breach. If the suit is successful, consumers who have their data exposed in a breach can be given anywhere from $100 to $750.
"There is the private right of action and the statutory damages. That is new and a game changer because defendants have historically challenged these data breach class actions on the basis that there isn't a sufficient allegation about damage or injury," Palmer explained.
She said because there are damages built into the statute, companies may have a harder time challenging the validity of any class action which arises from a data breach. As the law stands now, there is only a private right of action for a data breach and no other part of the statute.
Michelle Hon Donovan, a partner at Duane Morris in San Diego, said in-house counsel should begin looking at their consumer-facing agreements and find ways to get around a class action lawsuit. One of those measures would include adding an arbitration provision to the online agreements.
"You have to get the consumers to agree," Donovan said. "The companies can't just change their terms. That is going to be one of the big things to protect themselves against class action lawsuits."
Donovan said the language of the CCPA "appears to be making an attempt to circumvent" a contractual provision such as an arbitration agreement. However, she noted the CCPA does say that the act will not apply if the application is preempted by federal law. She said the U.S. Supreme Court case Kindred Nursing Centers v. Clark would preempt the CCPA's attempt to circumvent arbitration agreements. In Kindred, she explained, the court ruled that federal arbitration law preempts any state laws that attempt to limit arbitration.
"If you just put it on your website, it is not going to be enforceable," Donovan said.
Palmer added it's important to show how a company has been improving its cybersecurity and to create internal policies in the event of a data breach.
"Focus on data security to have a record to be able to demonstrate that you have a security posture," Palmer said.
Even if companies are prepared for the CCPA, those responsible for compliance and regulation should be keeping an eye on what other states are doing.
"The one thing that is becoming an emerging area is that other states are following the lead of California and enacting their own laws," Palmer said. "The CCPA is the first phase of a frontier of state statutes in this area. The CCPA is not going to be standing alone as time passes."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Trending Stories
- 1Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 2Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firms Innovator Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
- 3Trump's DOJ Files Lawsuit Seeking to Block $14B Tech Merger
- 4'No Retributive Actions,' Kash Patel Pledges if Confirmed to FBI
- 5Justice Department Sues to Block $14 Billion Juniper Buyout by Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250