Women Soccer Players' Suit Certification May Impact General Counsel Dealing With Pay Equity Issues
A federal court in Los Angeles on Friday certified the women's class action lawsuit against the U.S. Soccer Federation over unequal pay and working conditions.
November 08, 2019 at 05:33 PM
3 minute read
Star Megan Rapinoe and the world champion U.S. women's soccer team have claimed another victory. A federal court in Los Angeles on Friday certified the women's class action lawsuit against the U.S. Soccer Federation over unequal pay and working conditions.
The decision could impact general counsel whose companies are struggling with pay equity issues, as well as other sport leagues with men and women's teams.
Jeffrey Kessler, co-executive chairman of Winston & Strawn and co-chair of its sports law practice, filed the suit March 8 after mediation talks broke down. Kessler on Friday referred questions to Molly Levinson, the spokeswoman for the women soccer players.
Levinson said in an emailed statement, "This is a historic step forward in the struggle to achieve equal pay. We are so pleased that the court has recognized USSF's ongoing discrimination against women players—rejecting USSF's tired arguments that women must work twice as hard and accept lesser working conditions to get paid the same as men."
She called on soccer league president Carlos Cordeiro to end "the unlawful discrimination against women now."
Federation officials could not immediately be reached for comment, but have indicated in the past they would be open to returning to talks.
Lydia Wahlke, chief legal officer for the U.S. Soccer Federation, has previously told Corporate Counsel she could not discuss the issues during pending litigation.
The 28 named plaintiffs in the lawsuit include the women's World Cup most valuable player, Rapinoe, along with Alex Morgan, Carli Lloyd and Becky Sauerbrunn. All four were named class representatives. The court also appointed Winston & Strawn as class counsel.
U.S. District Judge R. Gary Klausner of the Central District of California wrote in the ruling the U.S. Soccer Federation's argument defending the current pay scale could lead to an "absurd result." Klausner said under the current scheme a woman could be paid half as much as a man, but could reach an equal pay level by working twice as many hours.
He ordered the parties to meet and submit final class notices to the court within 14 days.
The suit could impact other women's soccer teams around the world who also have begun demanding more equality. During this year's World Cup competition, several teams urged FIFA, the world's largest sports league, to ensure that women receive pay and working conditions equal to the men's teams. FIFA has taken steps but so far has not agreed to full equity.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Uncertainty Hovers Over PGA Merger, LIV Golf Hires Entertainment Industry Veteran as Legal Chief
A+E Networks CLO Retiring, Capping Storied, 40-Year Career in Entertainment Law
Australian Gambling-Machine Giant Hires Insider as CLO, Relocates Her to Las Vegas
Attorney Gives Up 25-Year Law Firm Career to Become CLO of Seattle's Pro Soccer Teams
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250