More Chinese Companies Are Joining US Firms to Fight 'Patent Trolls'
The LOT Network, a global group of companies that have teamed up to fight patent assertion entities, has seen an uptick in Chinese firms seeking membership alongside major U.S. businesses.
November 14, 2019 at 01:32 PM
4 minute read
Some of China's largest companies have banded together with major brands in the United States and elsewhere to neutralize the so-called "patent trolls," an indication that the country's firms are becoming increasingly concerned about patent infringement litigation.
More than two dozen Chinese businesses, including Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., Ant Financial Services Group, Meituan-Dianping and Yamaha Corp., are now members of the LOT Network, an international nonprofit group created in 2014 to ward off litigation from patent assertion entities. Half of those companies recently joined the group.
"The Chinese in particular are realizing that if they want to be successful selling their products globally, they have to have a global IP strategy," LOT Network CEO Ken Seddon said in a phone interview Tuesday while attending an intellectual property conference in Nanjing, China.
Global patent systems are becoming more robust, and the convergence of technology in myriad products, from smart TVs to cellphones and vehicles, has elevated the risk of patent litigation for companies throughout the world.
"If you look at China, the patent system is maturing, patents are becoming stronger and more valuable. Maybe 10 years ago companies could ignore the Chinese patent system. Nowadays you can't ignore it. I think that's fueled in part by the trade wars. People are realizing IP is going to be a component of that," added Seddon, former senior IP counsel for Apple Inc. and Intel Corp.
LOT's more than 540 members, which include Amazon Technologies Inc., Facebook Inc., Microsoft Corp., The Walt Disney Co. and Uber Technologies Inc., have entered into a legal agreement that provides them with immunity from patent infringement lawsuits brought by patent assertion entities that obtain patents from any member of the group.
"The number of companies participating in the LOT Network has increased rapidly recently," Naohiro Kosugi, general manager of Yamaha's IP division, wrote in an email. He noted that Yamaha is not facing many patent lawsuits now, but he believes that the future "risk is very high."
The LOT Network also has seen membership growth in Germany and Japan, according to Seddon. He said the group has members in 37 countries.
Toshiaki Tarumi, manager of the legal and IP division for Japanese video game maker Square Enix Holdings Co. Ltd., which is a LOT member, wrote in an email that "emerging industries like blockchain are joining the community, which means that members will have strong protection against PAE [patent assertion entity] suits involving new and evolving technologies."
He added, "PAEs don't always rely on legitimate claims, and we wanted to mitigate our risks so that the company can save its resources and put it toward our primary business of developing great products for our customers."
While stateside companies are traditionally wary of IP theft in China, they have a strong business incentive to join with Chinese companies to defend against patent assertion entities, according to Seddon.
"Just like Chinese companies want to participate in the U.S. market, U.S. companies want to participate in the Chinese market," he said. "These patents are there. And if your U.S. company wants to participate in the Chinese market, you're going to need to get access to that IP."
At the moment, "patent troll" litigation is far more prolific in the U.S. than in China. But Seddon said China, where more patents are filed annually than anywhere else in the world, is ripe for an explosion of litigation.
"As these Chinese patents age they will become more expensive to maintain with the maintenance fees and so the companies are going to be looking to sell their assets," he said. "Then you could have strong, enforceable Chinese patents coming out into the market. The environment is rich. The factors are there."
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
2 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readEx-Red Robin CLO Joins Norton Rose Fulbright After Helping Sell Latest Employer for $4.9 Billion
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250