Beyond Antitrust, US Justice Department Expands Its Review Into Big Tech Companies
U.S. Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen made clear Monday that the Department of Justice is continuing its serious examination of antitrust issues in the online technology industry, and that it won't hesitate to expand the review into other areas.
November 18, 2019 at 04:20 PM
4 minute read
U.S. Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen made clear Monday that the Department of Justice is continuing its serious examination of antitrust issues in the online technology industry, and that it won't hesitate to expand the review into other areas.
In remarks prepared for delivery to the American Bar Association's 2019 Antitrust Fall Forum in Washington, D.C., Rosen also said, "We do not view antitrust law as a panacea for every problem in the digital world. Indeed, we will not ignore any harms caused by online platforms that partially or completely fall outside the antitrust laws. We are keeping in mind other tools in areas such as privacy, consumer protection, and public safety as part of a broader review of online platforms."
Rosen said playing a key role in both the antitrust and the broader technology review is Ryan Shores, who joined Rosen's office last month as senior adviser for technology industries. Shores, formerly a partner with Shearman & Sterling, previously clerked for the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist.
While Rosen did not name any tech companies under review—nor did a July 23 press release announcing the review—it has been generally reported that Amazon.com Inc., Apple Inc., Facebook Inc. and Google LLC are under a Justice Department microscope.
When contacted by Corporate Counsel on Monday, Amazon's legal department through a spokesperson declined comment on Rosen's speech. Google and Facebook acknowledged receiving messages but didn't respond to the question. Apple did not respond to the message.
The general counsel involved are David Zapolsky at Amazon, Katherine Adams at Apple, Kent Walker at Google and the newest member of the group, Jennifer Newstead at Facebook. Newstead just joined Facebook after serving as a President Donald Trump-appointed legal adviser to the U.S. State Department.
In his speech, Rosen said, "The human impact of these technologies cannot be overstated. Ordinary Americans rely on them in their day-to-day lives."
He compared the industry to the early 20th century rise of major broadcast media, and the mid-20th century economic consolidation in the film industry. Both of which drew antitrust attention.
"Today, in the 21st century, we marvel at the world wide web and mobile technology, but we once again face questions about the consolidation of power by some companies that provide platforms for information exchange and related technologies," Rosen said.
He said, "In a relatively short amount of time, they have disrupted industries, amassed substantial economic power, and developed business models that monetize potentially sensitive consumer information that they control."
He referred to new allegations that platform operators are preventing disruption and preserving dominance. "It is therefore unsurprising that concerns about the leading online platforms have been widely expressed, including by industry participants who have direct insight into the competitive dynamics."
Rosen said many experts see "the structural features of today's major technology industries … as facilitating perpetual dominance."
He stressed that the department was being fair and open-minded in its review.
"We have not reached any ultimate conclusions yet," he said. "I want to underscore that. We will follow the evidence and, if it is warranted, we will enforce the law and seek appropriate remedies."
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh & McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readOpenAI, NYTimes Counsel Quarrel Over Erased OpenAI Training Data
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250