Number of SEC Enforcement Actions at Highest in 10 Years
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed 95 new enforcement actions against public companies in fiscal year 2019—the most actions filed in the past 10 years of tracking the numbers, the New York University Pollack Center for Law & Business and Cornerstone Research reported Wednesday.
November 20, 2019 at 03:40 PM
4 minute read
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed 95 new enforcement actions against public companies in fiscal year 2019—the most actions filed in the past 10 years of tracking the numbers.
The filings were a 30% increase over last year and were part of several significant trends reported Wednesday by the New York University Pollack Center for Law & Business and Cornerstone Research.
The report, "SEC Enforcement Activity: Public Companies and Subsidiaries—Fiscal Year 2019 Update," was co-authored by Sara Gilley, Cornerstone Research vice president. Gilley said in a statement, "Issuer reporting and disclosure actions against public companies helped to drive the record number of actions … similar to the high number of actions in [fiscal] 2016."
She was referring to allegations related to fraud and misconduct involving issuers and financial institutions. The commission brought 28 such actions, compared with an average of 20 per year from 2010 through 2018.
The overall increase in enforcement actions was also heavily driven by self-reporting under the commission's share class selection disclosure initiative. The initiative lets investment advisers avoid civil penalties by self-reporting any failure to make required conflict of interest disclosures when they receive fees for recommending certain mutual funds.
New York University law professor Stephen Choi, co-director of the Pollack Center and co-author of the report, told Corporate Counsel, "When you strip away the focus on the share initiative, the number is still high but not out of line with prior years."
Choi said the "big message" that general counsel can take from the report is that the dip in enforcement actions that occurred when the Trump administration took over in 2017 has ended and the numbers have returned to normal. "The SEC has since come back," he said, "and is enforcing vigorously."
Choi said one of the interesting trends to watch in the data was the record high percentage of cooperating defendants.
The report said the SEC noted cooperation by 76% of defendants this year, while the average from 2010 through 2018 was only 51%. "It confirms that the SEC is now focusing more on cooperation," he said.
Other trends to watch, he said, are the use of administrative law proceedings and the imposition of disgorgement. Both are being challenged in court.
The report showed in the first half of 2019 the commission brought 100% of its 52 enforcement actions as administrative proceedings, but in the second half the number dropped to 84%.
On disgorgement, Choi said historically the commission has ordered companies to cough up profits in roughly 50% of its monetary sanctions, and this year continued that trend. But if the U.S. Supreme Court rules in a pending case to limit the commission's power to impose disgorgement, Choi said, "it will affect how the SEC imposes monetary penalties going forward."
More trends noted in the report include:
- The largest settlement imposed in 2019 was $147 million—the lowest amount for the top settlement in the history of the database. The average settlement was $16 million. Settlements totaled $1.5 billion, consistent with the 2010 through 2018 average.
- This is the second consecutive year in which all 15 actions alleging violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act were brought as administrative proceedings. In comparison, only 51% of actions alleging FCPA violations were brought as administrative proceedings prior to fiscal year 2018.
- As usual, the finance, insurance and real estate industry received the most enforcement actions, accounting for 58% of them. The average over the prior nine fiscal years was 48% for the industry. A distant second was manufacturing, at 15%.
Correction: A previous version incorrectly said Gilley was referring to the self-reporting under the commission's Share Class Selection Disclosure Initiative. She was referring to allegations related to fraud and misconduct involving issuers and financial institutions.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
Financial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Trending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250