In-House Legal Departments Described at 'Tipping Point' With New Technology
Jonathan Brayne, head of Allen & Overy's legal tech space called Fuse, believes that the legal market has reached a "tipping point" and in-house law departments need to shift toward becoming tech-led providers of legal and risk anticipation services to become an integral part of their organizations.
December 02, 2019 at 05:05 PM
3 minute read
Jonathan Brayne, head of Allen & Overy's legal tech space called Fuse, believes that the legal market has reached a "tipping point" and in-house law departments need to shift toward becoming tech-led providers of legal and risk anticipation services to become an integral part of their organizations.
London-based Brayne recently released a white paper, "The Future of the In-House Legal Function," in which he discussed the pressures on general counsel for change and the key building blocks needed to meet the challenges of the future.
Brayne told Corporate Counsel on Monday that he sees in-house counsel "facing a decade of transformational change," and he hoped the paper would be a practical tool on how they can respond.
As his paper puts it, "Cost pressures, regulatory overload, the challenges of scale and global reach, advances in technology, diversification of providers and the workplace expectations of a new generation of lawyers entering the profession are combining to present the in-house legal function with choices that it can no longer defer or avoid."
Brayne predicted that in the future general counsel will identify the challenges they face, and suppliers will have to respond to those challenges.
The most significant challenge, he said, is probably "how you form your kind of routine, business-as-usual work without having to absorb huge amounts of time of high-quality expensive lawyers."
He described the answer as a sort of self-serve legal function, based on a chatbox or logic system, "empowering business colleagues to act, and transact, without direct lawyer involvement, yet safely within parameters set by the legal function."
He said the self-serve function will allow internal business clients to find answers to frequently asked questions so they can generate, negotiate, amend and conclude contracts on their own. Other challenges outlined in the paper include keeping up with regulatory and market changes; anticipating risk from compliance breaches, misconduct, litigation and arbitration; reshaping remediation activities; and moving from "a world of text to a world of data."
Brayne said artificial intelligence undoubtedly will expand in the next decade as well. "But in the short term, basic technologies such as workflow, database flow and collaboration tools will have a bigger impact."
Jean-Marc Chanoine, in-house counsel and global head of strategic accounts at Templafy, sees similar challenges for legal departments in the next few years. Chanoine is based in New York City although Templafy, a document automation and template management software company, is headquartered in Copenhagen, Denmark.
"For in-house counsel the keyword for 2020 is change," he said, "both technology change and regulatory change."
Chanoine said the main challenge comes down to preparing for risk, especially online security and privacy risks.
He mentioned the European General Data Protection Regulation and the new California Consumer Privacy Act going into effect in January. "Some of those rules carry monstrous fines," Chanoine said, "introducing a new economic risk to the company."
Chanoine added, "For a lot of lawyers, me included, it's brutally hard to change. But next year they need to be open and responsive to a dynamic and increasingly complex environment."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIn Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readPre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute readWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
$25M Grubhub Settlement Sheds Light on How Other Gig Economy Firms Can Avoid Regulatory Trouble
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250