Women, Influence & Power in Law 2019: Tara K. Giunta
Our 2019 special report honors women who have demonstrated a commitment to advancing the empowerment of women in law.
December 02, 2019 at 01:00 AM
4 minute read
Name: Tara K. Giunta
Category: Law Firm: Thought Leadership
Firm/Company: Paul Hastings
Title: Partner, Litigation
Time in Position: Since 2005
What was your route to the top?
Thirty-three years ago, I started my practice by advising clients in the international telecom/satellite industry as they expanded into foreign markets where the state-owned telecom networks were being privatized, and therefore the clients were interacting with government officials, both as regulators and system owners. That was my introduction to the FCPA. Fast-forward to the 2000s when, post Enron and WorldCom, the Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange [Commission] ramped up enforcement of the FCPA, resulting in a significant expansion of my client base into other industries, particularly those that are regulated and have high levels of interactions with government officials. Today, I advise C-suites and boards in identifying and mitigating risks, developing and enhancing compliance programs, investigating and remediating wrongdoing and/or internal control weaknesses, and conducting ABAC-related due diligence in M&A and other commercial transactions.
What keeps you up at night?
The biggest challenge for all of us is keeping up with ever-shifting risks facing companies. Today, it is not only the variety of risks but the speed with which risks can surface, and the fact that those risks can come in unanticipated areas and can be devastating to a company. How well an organization understands, addresses and mitigates those risks can significantly impact its ability to compete and succeed.
It is therefore increasingly important that boards and senior management have appropriate, differing and complementary skill sets, experience and perspectives. That is what initially got me interested in the issue of board diversity and, in particular, gender parity on boards, as well as the broader role of environmental, social and governance compliance for companies and their boards. These are, at heart, an issue of good corporate governance.
What is the best leadership advice you've given or received, and why do you think it was effective?
1. Listen. Make sure you understand what you are hearing and why you might be hearing it. 2. Do not assume you know the issue or answer too quickly, and make sure you have considered all sides. 3. Be humble. Each interaction is a potential teaching/learning moment. 4. Take your time. Your initial reaction may not be the most advisable, so give yourself the time to digest, reflect and then respond. Obviously, how much time you may be able to take differs depending upon the circumstances. 5. Be respectful to everyone. Full stop. No exceptions. And position should not factor into the equation!
Looking back, what do you wish you had known when you started out in the legal profession?
As a woman in the legal profession, I wish I had appreciated—33 years ago!—how critical it would be to establish, maintain and constantly expand my network. I wish I had appreciated need, and had the courage, to market myself and be fearless in doing so. In the late '80s and '90s, it was very challenging to be a woman in "Big Law." I had to prove myself every day, and I knew I was being evaluated against a standard that didn't permit me to be too aggressive, push back or get angry or frustrated. I couldn't risk being labeled as difficult, emotional or, God forbid, a feminist. Today, a lot of that has changed for the better, and there are more women in senior positions in companies and firms—although not nearly enough!
What is the most valuable career advice anyone has ever given you?
Trust your instincts. If it doesn't feel right, stop and reassess, even if it is coming from someone in a position of power and authority.
Be fearless. This is your moment (and all of the little moments that make up "your moment") in your career.
Believe that you actually might be the smartest person in the room!
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Unheard of Superpower': How Women's Soft Skills Can Drive Success in Negotiations
Tales From the Trenches: What Outside Counsel Do That GCs Find Inexcusable
Venus Williams Tells WIPL Crowd: 'Living Your Dreams Should Be Easy'
The 2024 WIPL Awards: Law Firm Mentor and Mentee Collaboration
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Revisiting the Boundaries Between Proper and Improper Argument: 10 Years Later
- 2Hochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
- 3Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
- 4Biden commutes sentences for 37 of 40 federal death row inmates, including two convicted of California murders
- 5Avoiding Franchisor Failures: Be Cautious and Do Your Research
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250