General Counsel Must Come to Grips With Artificial Intelligence
General counsel from a broad array of industries are grappling with the ramifications of AI, including its effects on geopolitics and cross-border regulations.
December 06, 2019 at 06:17 PM
3 minute read
Artificial intelligence is evolving and exposing companies to new areas of liability and regulatory minefields, which means it's high time for general counsel to get comfortable with AI if they want to avoid costly compliance missteps.
That's the takeaway from a report that Lex Mundi released on Thursday. The report is based on a workshop discussion that Lex Mundi, a Houston-based global network of independent law firms, hosted earlier this year in Amsterdam.
The conference, which brought together in-house leaders, lawyers and government officials from throughout the world, focused on how general counsel from a broad array of industries are grappling with the ramifications of AI, including its effects on geopolitics and cross-border regulations.
Alexander Birnstiel, a Brussels-based partner at Noerr who contributed to the report, noted that "companies and their in-house legal teams must navigate an environment characterized by a patchwork of new competition enforcement initiatives and regulatory rules across jurisdictions whenever they engage in digital business."
In-house leaders for global companies are going to have to be adept at navigating what the report describes as a complex "global web of regulatory activism" and "cross-border battlegrounds," the most notable of which at the moment is the 5G arms race.
"AI is changing the power balance and fueling the rise of new social-ideological blocks with the U.S. and China leading the way," the report states. "Companies will inevitably be caught in the enforcement crossfire as legal institutions evolve to accommodate this new technological reality."
Being prepared is the best way to dodge the crossfire, according to John Smith, a partner at Morrison Foerster and former director of the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control. Part of being prepared, he said in the report, means spending money on information technology resources and hiring top-notch compliance and legal teams.
Several of the conference participants also suggested that corporate boards include cyber experts, who can serve as a "valuable ally to a general counsel."
Government agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Australian Securities and Investment Commission, are already using AI to detect misconduct. At the same time, general counsel should be pushing companies to leverage the technology to identify potential regulatory issues before they become serious problems.
The report predicts that "analog-era compliance indicia such as leadership commitment, a rigorous code, training and other measures will become mere table stakes. Similar to financial services today, more companies will need AI systems and capabilities to self-monitor compliance."
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readHow Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readDog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250