Ex-GC Claims CFO Was Fixing Books to Give Executives Bonuses
Steven Berkovitch filed suit Dec. 6 on behalf of Five Hole LLC against Oded Segev in Delaware Chancery Court over allegations of breach of fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment and conversion.
December 10, 2019 at 02:29 PM
4 minute read
The former general counsel of a merchant cash advance company is suing the chief financial officer of its parent company claiming documents had been altered to allow for bonuses in 2017 and 2018.
Steven Berkovitch filed suit Dec. 6 on behalf of Five Hole LLC against Oded Segev in Delaware Chancery Court over allegations of breach of fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment and conversion. Berkovitch is seeking a court order requiring an independent audit of Five Hole's 2017 and 2018 finances, disgorgement of all bonuses improperly paid in 2017 and/or 2018, removal of Segev as CFO, and awards to be determined by the court.
In 2015, Pearl Capital Business Funding LLC, a company owned by Five Hole, hired Berkovitch to be its general counsel and in the same year, Five Hole's CEO, Solomon Lax, asked him to buy a 0.33% membership, or $68,000, into the company. According to the complaint, Lax allegedly promised to Berkovitch that there would be a return on investment for all Five Hole members.
Berkovitch says he has not yet received any kind of return on his investment.
Before Berkovitch was hired, Pearl hired Ariel Bouskila as associate general counsel to assist in collecting advances to merchant cash advances companies that were in default. In 2016, Berkovitch and Bouskila told Pearl they wanted to do collections for other MCACs. Pearl allowed the formation of the law firm Berkovitch & Bouskila but created an entity, ABF Servicing, which allowed them to get revenue from Berkovitch and Bouskila.
The agreement the law firm had with Pearl was that Berkovitch & Bouskila would lease employees from ABF and ABF would receive a percentage of revenue brought in from non-Pearl clients. Pearl agreed to provide the law firm with an extra bonus if the recovery exceeded a certain threshold. The law firm exceeded the threshold, which is not listed in the complaint, and it allegedly did not receive the promised bonus.
Under the service agreement, in 2017, the law firm was owed at least $392,285.37. Pearl only paid the firm $50,000, according to the complaint. Segev, Five Hole's CFO, allegedly told Berkovitch in January 2018 that Five Hole "failed to properly account for that expense in its 2017 financial statements."
"Segev later explained that he refused to revise Pearl's 2017 financial statements because accurately reflecting the amount due to B&B for 2017 would have lowered Five Hole's Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, and Amortizations (EBITA) for 2017," the complaint says.
If the EBITA had been properly calculated, the complaint argues, Segev and the other members of the executive committee of Five Hole would not have received their bonuses in 2017.
On Jan. 5, 2018, Segev wired a $100,000 partial payment to the law firm and in April 2018, Five Hole paid the remaining balance. The complaint says Segev calculated the $100,000 amount so it would not catch the eye of auditors.
Berkovitch claims that he went to the director of human resources and the chief credit officer at Pearl about Segev's alleged bookkeeping issues. They both dismissed him. Berkovitch has also sent a letter to Lax, and the board of managers at Five Hole. The letter showed the alleged financial impropriety, its effects on Five Hole and demanded that Five Hole fire Segev. The letter also asked Five Hole to hire an independent auditor to review its 2017 and 2018 financial statements.
Berkovitch is represented by Marc Casarino and Nicholas Wynn of White and Williams in Wilmington, Delaware. A representative for the law firm said it does not comment on ongoing litigation.
Counsel for Segev was not listed on the docket. Segev could not be reached for comment on Tuesday.
This is not the first time Berkovitch has made these allegations in court. He previously filed suit against Five Hole and Segev making similar claims in Kings County Supreme Court in New York. That case was dismissed in August, according to the online docket.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute read'We’re Here to Empower People to Make Good Decisions': Why Compliance Chiefs Must Learn to Think Like a Businessperson
Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250