The Trick to Changing Industries as Your In-House Career Progresses
While it may sound impossible to shift industries, we as lawyers are trained to find loopholes—and a few do exist to help you get your foot in the door of a new industry.
December 10, 2019 at 11:45 AM
5 minute read
As a lawyer progresses in his in-house career, chances are he will reach a crossroads and decide it is time to make a change. Sometimes that change is as traditional as switching to a peer company or advancing up the corporate ladder, but other times, they are looking to make a bigger splash and change industries entirely—which becomes a bit more complex.
As a general rule, the longer you work in one industry, the more difficult it is to switch. Most of the time, when companies are hiring—and particularly when they are hiring through an executive search firm like Major, Lindsey & Africa—they are looking for a very specific background and exact experience, which translates into an ability to get up to speed quickly. Companies have high expectations. They know what they want, including someone who knows the particulars of an industry, the other players and the challenges that industry may face. They are also aware that a candidate who has worked in the industry will likely know outside counsel who work best with their industry needs, have contacts in the industry who can be leveraged and belong to groups of similarly experienced peers (and if they are hiring a search firm, they are expecting their exact criteria to be met).
While it may sound impossible to shift industries, we as lawyers are trained to find loopholes—and a few do exist to help you get your foot in the door of a new industry:
- Stay in the family. The easiest way to switch industries is to move into a closely related one. If you are in pharmaceuticals, consider a medical device company or another highly regulated industry, for example. These similarly situated companies will be looking for talent that can quickly navigate the nuances of their field. If you have relatable experience, you will be able to more easily transition without having to brush up on every regulation within that industry; and for those you will need to learn, you will already have demonstrated your ability to get up to speed just by having held your previous role.
- Capitalize on your skills. Many of the skills you use daily will be valuable to a new employer—and the more unique those skills are, the less focus will be placed on your industry experience. For example, crisis management or change management experience will be extremely appealing to a company bouncing back from a tough time or being acquired. Also, if you have experience as general counsel of a public company and have worked closely with a board of directors, another public company may appreciate your existing ability to be a partner in the boardroom. Do your research and identify which of your transferable skills will be most beneficial to a company you are considering in a different industry and leverage those.
- Lean on your connections. This is where who you know and building your network early in your career really matters. If you want to switch industries, take advantage of that someone you know who can hire you or help you get introduced to someone in another industry. When you have made the right connections and a name for yourself in the legal community, those connections are likely to know (and recognize) your skills, reputation and potential and give you a chance because they realize you are smart and can do the job. They will have seen you prove yourself time and time again throughout your career and have confidence in your abilities. This is often the case with your outside counsel. Your outside counsel is highly motivated to help you segue into a new role and can speak to your gravitas, overall intelligence and skillset.
- Downsize your reach. Sometimes the answer is to move to a smaller company where your experience will be valued above all else. Startups and more niche companies are more likely to prioritize your overall expertise as a "must have" rather than your background in a specific industry. Also the smaller company experience will likely require you to utilize a broader range of skills, which will enhance your arsenal of transferrable skills should the time come to make another career move into a larger organization.
- Take a step back. If swimming in the big pond is as important to you as switching industries, then consider taking a lesser role in a larger company. The higher up the totem pole the role, the more exacting the requirements will be for the person the hiring manager desires. Your lack of experience in the industry will most likely eliminate you from consideration for the general counsel role, but your experience in M&A may make you the perfect fit for a senior attorney role within the legal department.
Switching industries in the legal profession is not the easiest of feats, but it can be done if you are willing to be patient and keep an open mind when an opportunity does present itself. If you think the next step in your career is to change course, start building up your network and investing in the skills you will need to become a viable candidate in a new industry.
Deborah Ben-Canaan is a partner in the in-house practice group of Major, Lindsey & Africa, based in Washington, D.C.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
11 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250