Chief Financial Officer Seeks to Dismiss Ex-General Counsel's Fraud Lawsuit
Attorneys for the chief financial officer accused by a former general counsel of fixing finances to avoid auditors say in a motion to dismiss that the lawyer does not have the standing to sue because he is bringing these claims to "gain leverage in his other litigation."
December 19, 2019 at 03:47 PM
4 minute read
Attorneys for the chief financial officer accused by a former general counsel of fixing finances to avoid auditors say in a motion to dismiss that the lawyer does not have the standing to sue because he is bringing these claims to "gain leverage in his other litigation."
Steven Berkovitch filed suit Dec. 6 on behalf of Five Hole LLC, a merchant cash advance company, against Oded Segev in Delaware Chancery Court claiming breach of fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment and conversion. Berkovitch is seeking a court order requiring an independent audit of Five Hole's 2017 and 2018 finances, disgorgement of all bonuses improperly paid in 2017 and/or 2018, removal of Segev as CFO, and awards to be determined by the court.
Berkovitch was formerly the general counsel of Pearl Capital Business Funding LLC, a company owned by Five Hole, and created a law firm, Berkovitch & Bouskila, to make collections for the company and for other companies looking to outsource the work as a way to bring himself and Pearl more revenue. He claims the company did not pay him bonuses that were promised and Segev was fixing the books.
Attorneys for Segev, however, claim that Berkovitch does not have the standing to file a claim against Segev. Segev's attorneys argue in the motion to dismiss that Berkovitch failed to name a necessary party in the suit; he does not have derivative standing to pursue his claims because he does not own an interest in Five Hole; he made a demand of the board of managers only 23 days before filing the complaint, which is not enough time under Delaware law; and because he is not an adequate derivative plaintiff.
"Berkovitch has filed disputes in multiple forums against Five Hole and its subsidiaries or officers, and the disparity between the value of those claims and the claims he seeks here is strong evidence that he is bringing these claims merely to gain leverage in his other litigation," the motion to dismiss says. "Under Delaware law, Plaintiff cannot show that he can meet his ongoing fiduciary obligations and, therefore, cannot establish that he is an adequate derivative plaintiff."
In a statement to Corporate Counsel, Joseph Tuso, a partner at Reed Smith in Philadelphia, representing Segev, said Segev denies the claims in Berkovitch's complaint and the claims are without merit.
"This most recent filing is now the fifth proceeding initiated by Mr. Berkovitch, who has already been ordered to pay Mr. Segev and Five Hole LLC $96,000 in attorneys' fees following the dismissal of a similar complaint that had been filed in New York," Tuso said. "That same court denied and dismissed a separate action brought by Mr. Berkovitch seeking to stay an arbitration that he initiated on behalf of Berkovitch & Bouskila. Mr. Segev and Five Hole fully intend to hold Mr. Berkovitch accountable for his continued vexatious filings and demonstrably false statements."
Segev is also represented by Wayne Stansfield and Nicholas Rodriguez of Reed Smith in Philadelphia; Brian Rostocki of Reed Smith in Wilmington, Delaware; and Blake Rohrbacher and Matthew Murphy of Richards, Layton & Finger in Wilmington.
Berkovitch is represented by Marc Casarino and Nicholas Wynn of White and Williams in Wilmington. A representative for the law firm did not respond to request for comment Thursday. A spokesperson for the firm previously said they do not comment on ongoing litigation.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readHow Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readDog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250