Script Care General Counsel Frank Messina Works Amid Drug Price Battles
Corporate Counsel recently talked with Messina about his role behind the scenes of the drug price controversy.
December 26, 2019 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
Somewhere, working quietly in the shadow of headlines about high prescription drug prices, is general counsel Frank Messina of Script Care Ltd. in Beaumont, Texas.
Script Care is one of the nation's largest privately owned pharmacy benefit managers—a power broker between insurance companies and the pharmaceutical industry.
Working for member corporations, a PBM—as Messina and the industry call it—negotiates drug price contracts with lawyers representing networks of nearly 70,000 pharmacies across America.
Corporate Counsel recently talked with Messina about his role behind the scenes of the drug price controversy. Here are his comments, edited for clarity and brevity.
Corporate Counsel: First, tell me a little about your background.
Frank Messina: I've been practicing law for 10 years. Prior to Script Care, I was an attorney at Germer with an emphasis in commercial litigation and employment law. I've been at Script Care six years, and I'm the sole in-house counsel, responsible for all aspects of its corporate governance, legal operations, litigation efforts and regulatory compliance. Handling all of these areas requires being highly specialized within the PBM industry, but also being a "jack of all trades" in all things general counsel. It's a constant juggling act, but I love it.
CC: What is a pharmacy benefit manager, and how does it affect drug prices?
FM: Candidly, prior to being contacted by Script Care, I was unfamiliar with PBMs. Any company that has health insurance has a PBM. They are an integral hub within the prescription industry chain that negotiates on behalf of their clients with pharmacies and pharmaceutical manufacturers to lower prescription costs for clients. In a nutshell, PBMs are responsible for developing the lists of drugs, called formularies, that offer the greatest value and efficacy for patients. PBMs contract with pharmacy providers to control prescription costs, negotiate competitive discounts or rebates with pharmaceutical manufacturers to offset prescription costs, and process and pay prescription drug claims.
CC: Describe the key elements of your job?
FM: I do tons of negotiations on contracts and oversee litigation, working with outside counsel. A key, overarching element of my job is to understand all aspects of the PBM industry, as well as Script Care's business lines and business goals.
In private practice, I used to be able to say, "The issue presented is more of a business decision." But that verbiage has been almost entirely removed from my vocabulary now. I have to view legal issues, such as deals or legal disputes, through the lens of business goals now.
CC: Do you use artificial intelligence to analyze data or other technology to handle your contracts?
FM: Deloitte [Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Ltd.] actually brought up the idea of artificial intelligence software, but we haven't decided to look at that yet. We are looking at purchasing a searchable database for all our contracts.
CC: What do you see as your biggest successes?
FM: One of our biggest successes was to be one of the first PBMs in the industry to actively investigate, obtain recoveries through litigation or mediation, and halt opportunistic compounding pharmacies throughout the nation. The compounding labs were attempting to bilk money from clients with elaborate billing schemes.
Another big success was renegotiating multifaceted pharmaceutical rebate agreements that have benefited our clients with increased savings while attracting new clients seeking prescription savings.
We also just won in October a massive lawsuit against a competing PBM, but there is a nondisclosure agreement so I cannot discuss it further. I can say it was time-consuming.
CC: What factors will likely impact your job and your company in 2020?
FM: The PBM industry is rapidly evolving with new laws, regulations and industry changes. For instance, over the past several years federal and state legislation has increasingly been implemented to govern PBMs, and I think this trend will continue.
I also anticipate that the PBM client-contracting model will continue to evolve to provide more price transparency, and PBMs like Script Care that are already fully transparent on their costs will benefit from these new regulations.
Additionally, I expect an increase in value-based rebate agreements that tie drug reimbursement to how well the drug performs in treating the patient.
Another hot topic will be the ever-increasing costs of specialty drugs and a PBM's ability to manage these costs through its various pricing tools, such as drug utilization reviews, step therapy and comparative effectiveness reviews.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTC Launches Inquiry of Single-Family Rental Home 'Mega Investors,' Issues PBM Report
5 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
People and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250