2030 Vision: In-House Counsel's Role Will Grow
I am stealing Heather's title from Corporate Counsel's January cover ("2020 Vision"), but with a twist of chutzpah. I am going to share my predictions of what in-house careers will look like in 2030.
January 08, 2020 at 11:35 AM
3 minute read
Happy new decade and thank you for reading this column, which I have been fortunate enough to author for about that length of time. My sincere thanks as well to Corporate Counsel editor-in-chief Heather D. Nevitt, and her predecessors, for deciding that my career missives merit your consideration.
I am stealing Heather's title from Corporate Counsel's January cover ("2020 Vision"), but with a twist of chutzpah. I am going to share my predictions of what in-house careers will look like in 2030. My crystal ball reveals:
- You will office virtually, whether or not you want to do so. Traditional headquarters as we know them will be mainly gone. There will be occasional in-person gatherings and retreats. But geography will no longer drive in-house counsel hiring. Virtual meeting technology will evolve and allow for sufficiently robust human interactions.
- Artificial intelligence won't take your job by 2030. I was wrong 10 years ago when, influenced largely by Richard Susskind's book "The End of Lawyers?", I predicted that by 2020 a large percentage of bread and butter in-house roles would go away. I have never been so happy to be wrong. It's always trendy to predict how technology will disrupt each profession. But I think what we've learned is that judgment, persuasion, politics and decision-making will remain in human hands a bit longer than the technologists would like.
- I predict the birth of a new kind of billable hour. I don't care about the law firm billable hour, which may or may not still be the dominant outside counsel business model by 2030. I do care about how in-house counsel are compensated. I also know that many of you crave flexible work/life balance schedules. What do the terms full-time, part-time and flex-time all have in common? The word time! And Big Brother-caliber technology will be able to track yours, no matter the work platform or location. When and where we work will become less relevant, but how much we work will still matter to employers. And paying for many roles by the hour can provide fairness to employer and employee alike. Don't worry, it will not be minimum wage.
- I have one regulatory related prediction. I am politically neutral and have a distaste for regulation generally, which drives my mainly liberal friends in Chicago where I live a bit crazy. However, I fear that climate change is indeed the great underestimated crisis of our time. In 2030, I think all in-house lawyers will in some manner be environmental lawyers. And by that, I mean climate change-related regulations will come to dominate almost every industry. In-house counsel will fill a critical role for society, by counseling their employers on how to navigate environmental standards that we are not fathoming in 2020.
My conclusion will sound pandering, but it's my genuine belief. In 2030, the role of in-house counsel will be more important than ever.
Mike Evers recruits attorneys for corporate legal departments throughout the United States. Visit www.everslegal.com. His firm also offers experienced in-house counsel to companies on an adjunct basis.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
11 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Companies' Dirty Little Secret: Those Privacy Opt-Out Requests Usually Aren't Honored
- 2Remembering Ted Olson
- 3Support Magistrates: Statutorily Significant
- 4Nelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
- 5Immunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250