From Staples to LexisNexis: The Evolution of a Legal Operations Career
"I was lucky to work for three GCs at Staples who valued legal operations and helped to build the role," Joanne Irwin, senior product manager at LexisNexis, said of her time in legal operations at Staples.
January 09, 2020 at 05:09 PM
4 minute read
Four years before the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium was founded and nine years before the Association of Corporate Counsel created a legal operations arm, Joanne Irwin was asked to help find a contract management system.
It was 2006, and Irwin was a procurement compliance manager at office supplies retailer Staples Inc. based in Framingham, Massachusetts. Working on the contract management system made the legal department at Staples realize it needed someone to manage new systems that were being put in place, and this broadened her role.
"Legal operations was not as widespread and not as common as it is today," Irwin, now a product manager at LexisNexis, said in an interview with Corporate Counsel. She joined LexisNexis in 2013.
"I was effectively the [chief operating officer] of the legal department," Irwin said.
It was largely a one-woman legal operations function at Staples in the time that Irwin served as the company's director of legal operations. Toward the end of her time at Staples, she explained, legal administrators in the company who had more than just administrative responsibilities ended up working under Irwin.
This was during a time when there was still doubt cast on the idea of having one person dedicated to legal operations. However, Irwin said she received support from the top during her 10 years in the legal department from general counsels Jack VanWoerkom, Kristin Campbell and Michael Williams.
"I was lucky to work for three GCs at Staples who valued legal operations and helped to build the role," she said.
Irwin explained that when she joined the legal department at Staples, LexisNexis' CounselLink had been implemented as the legal department's e-billing system. Eventually, the department went out to bid to explore other products in the legal space which included e-billing and matter management and in 2010 LexisNexis came back to demo an updated CounselLink. She said she had previously become a power user of CounselLink and helped in the demonstrations.
"It was clearly the better product," Irwin recalled. "I was doing demos with [the consultant] in the room to our colleagues in Australia."
The consultant was impressed with Irwin's ability to use CounselLink and said that LexisNexis was hiring consultants. Initially, Irwin thought she didn't want to become a consultant. However, after speaking to colleagues she decided she wanted the next challenge and initially interviewed with a LexisNexis competitor to become a consultant.
"I decided that I was more comfortable with CounselLink," she explained on her decision to work with LexisNexis.
For five years she served as a senior business consultant for LexisNexis' CounselLink and in 2018 was made product manager and in 2019 was made senior product manager.
Irwin said she has seen a number of changes in legal operations over the years. When she started, matter management was just a buzz phrase and few legal departments have implemented those systems.
Going into 2020, Irwin said she expects more legal operations functions will take advantage of enterprise legal management systems.
"You're able to see beyond what you are farming out to law firms," Irwin said. "You're able to track efficiencies so that GCs have data to back up their saving opportunities."
Correction: The original story published had a few inaccuracies. Framingham was misspelled. It was written Irwin had joined LexisNexis in 2010. She started in 2013. Irwin was the director of legal operations at Staples, not the director of legal processes and systems. LexisNexis' CounselLink is clarified as an e-billing system. Irwin worked on contract management systems, not project management systems.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDigging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
5 minute readElaine Darr Brings Transformation and Value to DHL's Business
PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250