What In-House Counsel Need to Know About New Export Control on AI
Trade lawyers say new export restrictions on artificial intelligence software used to analyze geospatial imagery could cover a broad array of industries.
January 09, 2020 at 01:50 PM
4 minute read
|
The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security kicked off the New Year by enacting the agency's first export restrictions on a so-called "emerging" technology—artificial intelligence software used to analyze geospatial imagery, such as satellite images.
The interim control took effect Monday, which means the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States also could begin scrutinizing geospatial AI software as a technology that is critical to national security under the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act.
Stakeholders in the AI sector had been waiting for the Commerce Department to enact controls on emerging technology for more than a year. Now, tech companies are eager to know whether their software falls under the restriction, which could cast a net over a wide range of industries, according to international trade lawyers.
Marwa Hassoun, an international trade partner at Arent Fox in Los Angeles, wrote in an email that her "understanding is that the software may be used in a wide array of applications," including commercial and military, satellite and aircraft surveillance and real estate development.
She and other trade lawyers also suggested that the control could apply to the AI mapping software used in self-driving cars.
But Matthew Borman, deputy assistant secretary of commerce for export administration, indicated while speaking at the National Council for International Trade Development earlier this week that the new regulation was "not intended to impact autonomous vehicles," according to Hassoun.
"That being said, our clients involved in this area are still addressing for applicability—while it may not have been intended to cover, they still need to ensure it doesn't cover their self-driving software," she said.
Companies that are making geospatial AI software must obtain permission from the Bureau of Industry and Security before exporting the tech to any country except Canada. The firms also need to know that the new control applies to "deemed exports," or transfer of software to foreign citizens in the U.S.
"Many companies have non-U.S. person employees that work on this type of technology, and while they can continue to work on the technology, access to the software may be restricted until the company obtains an authorization," Hassoun said.
Clifton Burns, a senior counsel at Crowell & Moring in Washington, D.C., who advises domestic and international clients on export controls, had a different recommendation. He advised that companies "isolate foreign employees from working on the software until authorization can be obtained."
He expected that the Commerce Department would likely grant licenses for the export of geospatial AI to allied countries while denying licenses for shipment to China and Russia, for instance.
While the interim rule is in effect, the Bureau of Industry and Security is accepting comments on the new regulation until March 6 and could issue a final rule as early as later this year, according to Hassoun.
"We encourage companies to begin to formulate comments, both from a technical perspective to obtain clarification on the control and a regulatory perspective, such as thinking about what license exceptions may help with future exports/reexports/transfers while not compromising national security," she said.
She also advised companies to "prepare for potential changes in the control, such as what it exactly covers and applicable license exceptions that can be used, when the final rule is released."
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
4 minute readAfter 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 2Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 3Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
- 4Foreign-Company Lobbyists Would Need to Register Under Proposed DOJ Regulation
- 5'Fancy Dress': ERISA Claim Accuses Plan Administrator and Cigna Affiliates of Co-Pay Maximizer Scheme
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250