Jack in the Box Promotes General Counsel Ahead of Chief Legal Officer's Exit
The San Diego-based restaurant chain announced on Monday that Sarah Super was elevated from vice president to senior VP and also appointed chief risk officer. She'll continue to serve as general counsel as the chief legal officer plans to leave next month.
January 13, 2020 at 03:49 PM
4 minute read
Jack in the Box Inc. has given general counsel Sarah Super a promotion and an additional title as the restaurant chain grapples with disgruntled franchisees and prepares for the departure of the company's chief legal officer and CEO.
The San Diego-based company announced on Monday that Super was elevated from vice president to senior VP and also appointed chief risk officer. She'll continue to serve as general counsel of the company, where she's worked for six years.
Departing chief legal officer Phillip Rudolph had also served as the company's chief risk officer. The firm announced in late September that Rudolph was slated to step down on Feb. 28, along with two other executives who left earlier this month.
The company stated that "others within the organization" would assume the responsibilities of the three departing executives.
Super joined Jack in the Box as vice president and associate general counsel in December 2013, after representing the company for five years as outside counsel while she was a partner at Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani in Los Angeles. She was named general counsel in November 2019, according to her LinkedIn profile.
Attempts to speak with Super and Jack in the Box representatives about Super's promotion were not immediately successful. The company also promoted two other female executives, Adrienne Ingoldt, now senior VP, chief brand and experience officer; and Jennifer Kennedy, senior VP, chief product and innovation officer.
"These executives have brought great value to our company, and in their new roles will continue to serve the needs of all our stakeholders," Jack in the Box CEO Lenny Comma said in a statement.
In 2018, the National Jack in the Box Franchisee Association demanded that the company replace Comma in the wake of a vote of no confidence in the firm's management. Later that same year, the association sued the company in Los Angeles. The franchisees want a court order that will allow them to audit the company's marketing fund.
"We are concerned an investigation may reveal that some of those funds may have been used to offset normal operational expenses," said the association's attorney, Robert Zarco of Zarco Einhorn Salkowski & Brito in Miami.
Zarco added that he's had "positive dealings" with Super. He described her as a "very capable lawyer" who has "her finger on the pulse of what is going on in the company and the direction the company needs to take if it's going to improve its relationship with its franchisees."
In December, the company disclosed that Comma was on the way out, though he has not set a specific exit date. The company has hired Chicago-based executive search firm Spencer Stuart to help find Comma's successor.
Comma said in a statement that he was involved in the search and would work closely with his successor "to assure a smooth and successful leadership transition for the company and its stakeholders, including our incredible guests, employees, franchisees, suppliers and, of course, shareholders."
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Unheard of Superpower': How Women's Soft Skills Can Drive Success in Negotiations
Tales From the Trenches: What Outside Counsel Do That GCs Find Inexcusable
Venus Williams Tells WIPL Crowd: 'Living Your Dreams Should Be Easy'
The 2024 WIPL Awards: Law Firm Mentor and Mentee Collaboration
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250