Treasury Dept. Enacts Final Rules on Foreign Investment: Key Takeaways for In-House Counsel
Final regulations from the U.S. Treasury Department governing national security reviews by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States were issued Monday, with importance for general counsel in many industries—including venture capital—whose companies are involved in cross-border dealmaking.
January 14, 2020 at 06:16 PM
7 minute read
Long-awaited final rules from the U.S. Treasury Department governing national security reviews of foreign investments in U.S. companies were issued Monday, with importance for general counsel in specific industries—including venture capital—who are involved in cross-border dealmaking.
"General counsel and in-house counsel at companies involved in technology, infrastructure and data, which capture a broad spectrum of the economy should be aware of these changes, particularly the expanded jurisdiction of CFIUS and mandatory reporting requirements," said Christian Davis, an international trade partner at Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld in Washington, D.C. He was referring to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S., the interagency panel chaired by the Treasury secretary.
But the Treasury Department generally excluded from the new regulations most deals from Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom, unless there is a concern about foreign control of the acquiring companies.
"The only countries that are initially eligible for exemptions are the U.K., Canada and Australia. As a result, most investors will be subject to the new expanded jurisdiction of these rules," Davis said.
Mario Mancuso, partner at Kirkland & Ellis and leader of its international trade and national security practice, said in an email, "the selection of the U.K., Australia, and Canada as the first 'excepted foreign states' is not surprising in light of their shared security perspectives and interests. With that said, it's important to note that not every investor from one of these countries will be exempt from CFIUS' jurisdiction, and the exemption applies only to certain non-controlling investments and real estate transactions. In other words, the CFIUS calculus for traditional M&A will not materially change as a result of this action."
Anne Salladin, a partner at Hogan Lovells in its regulatory practice group, said, "It's a new concept and we will have to see how it plays out going forward." She added, "I would call it a bit of a test run and it is a totally new concept for this committee."
Aside from the "whitelisting" of those three countries, the final rules for national security reviews of foreign investment transactions hewed closely to the draft rules proposed last fall. The final regulations take effect Feb. 13 and were enacted under the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018.
The regulations require mandatory filing for CFIUS review of two categories of investments: First, certain foreign government-backed investments in U.S. businesses, and, second, certain foreign investments in critical technology companies. Most filings remain voluntary, however.
"Anyone with pie-in-the-sky hopes of dramatic changes from September [when the draft rules were issued] were probably disappointed," said Ken Nunnenkamp, international trade and national security partner at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius in Washington, D.C.
"This is the new paradigm and there's still more to come on penalties, definitions and fees," he said. "The venture capital community was introduced to this new world in September and it is not going away."
The final rules significantly extend the power of the interagency committee to review for national security threats private equity and minority-stake, non-controlling investment deals involving foreign entities and persons. As always, the panel can require modification of deals, or not approve them.
Mancuso said U.S. private equity investors would likely benefit from the new proposed definition of "principal place of business," which, he said "provides important clarity on when investments by U.S.-controlled funds through non-U.S. fund vehicles may be subject to CFIUS' legal jurisdiction."
The final rules also expand reviews of real estate transactions located near military installations, airports and maritime ports. The real estate transactions are not subject to a mandatory declaration requirement but urban areas aren't completely exempt.
Giovanna Cinelli, leader of the international trade and national security practice at Morgan Lewis, said the Treasury Department resisted calls from some trade groups for the new regulations to narrowly define "national security." Instead, she said, the department "confirmed its longstanding approach that there is no set definition of national security and it wouldn't be appropriate to come up with a standing definition."
The final rules increase scrutiny of investments—including minority investments—by foreign entities and persons of the U.S. in critical technology, infrastructure and data businesses (TID) in the United States, including those handling specific types of sensitive personal data on more than 1 million U.S. residents, which could include big insurers and financial services companies among many others.
"While CFIUS did build in some new exemptions to these filing requirements, parties will need to ensure that they are complying with these rules in the context of transactions going forward," Davis said.
Nunnenkamp said, "As a practical matter all transactions where foreign money is coming in must do this analysis up-front," especially with respect to TID transactions.
The Treasury Department said it would publish separate proposed regulations regarding filing fees and penalties at a later date.
Direct investment in U.S. companies from China in particular has declined dramatically since 2016, plunging from more than $46.5 billion that year to about $3.1 billion in 2019, not solely because of CFIUS rules and U.S.-China trade battles, but also because of internal factors in China, according to the Rhodium Group, a research organization. Venture capital from China into U.S. companies also declined last year to the smallest level since 2015, according to data from Refinitiv.
Signs of a possible thaw in U.S.-China trade tensions recently have appeared, however: The Treasury Department also announced Monday its intention to lift its designation of China as a currency manipulator. And the two countries are expected to sign a "phase one" compromise trade deal Wednesday.
In a statement, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said of the CFIUS rules: "These regulations strengthen our national security and modernize the investment review process and also maintain our nation's open investment policy by encouraging investment in American businesses and workers, and by providing clarity and certainty regarding the types of transactions that are covered."
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllProf's Stinging Conclusion: Lawyers for Purdue Pharma Were 'Overzealous Accomplices in Corporate Misconduct'
6 minute readSage Therapeutics Axes GC After Drug-Pipeline Failures Force Cost-Cutting
After Guiding Illumina Through Harrowing Merger Fight, GC Charles Dadswell to Depart
Ex-Lucid, Tesla Legal Leader Joins Gene Therapy Startup With IPO Ambitions
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250