Half of Legal Departments Do Not Have Anyone Dedicated to Legal Operations
The idea that legal departments still operate as cost centers and a lack of education on the benefits of legal operations is partly why just less than half of legal departments do not have a dedicated legal operations professional on staff.
January 31, 2020 at 04:29 PM
3 minute read
The idea that legal departments still operate as cost centers and a lack of education on the benefits of legal operations is partly why just less than half of legal departments do not have a dedicated legal operations professional on staff.
According to the recent Association of Corporate Counsel's 2020 Chief Legal Officers Survey, 46% of top company lawyers indicated they do not have any legal operations professionals with another 24% having one professional.
"The legal department is generally considered a cost center even though, like many overhead functions, it plays a vital role in the business. All companies these days are fixated on keeping a lid on the head count," Catherine Moynihan, executive director of the Association of Corporate Counsel's legal operations arm, said in an interview. "Companies generally prioritize investing in revenue-generating functions."
Many who indicated they do not have a dedicated legal operations professional come from small companies with small legal departments, Moynihan added.
According to additional data sent to Corporate Counsel by the ACC, the smaller the legal department the less likely it is to have a legal operations professional. Roughly 26% of legal departments with two to five employees have only one legal operations professional.
Moynihan said executives outside of the legal department need to be educated on the value of legal operations.
"Once you have someone [legal operations professional] the value is clearer," Moynihan said. "The hard part seems to be getting the first person started."
She said there is a benefit to those who build their legal departments with a legal operations professional in place because the department is "building for scalability."
"Which is much better than where we see legal departments find themselves where they try to keep up with the business by adding lawyers," Moynihan said. "Then they reach an inflection point where they realize that isn't working."
In a recent interview with Corporate Counsel, Ironclad Inc.'s general counsel, Chris Young, said the first two hires in his newly formed legal department were legal operations professionals.
"We wanted to set our policies and our systems up so that when talent came in they could hit the ground running and focus on the impactful legal work that lawyers really enjoy," Young said.
Mike Haven, a member of the board of directors at the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium, said it becomes harder to implement legal operations as the legal department grows. He said overlooking legal operations can result in attorneys doing more work related to operations than the legal work they were hired to do.
"The further you get going down the road in a growing legal department without implementing legal ops, the harder it is to implement it," Haven said. "If you get legal ops in the department early on, you get it right sooner and that requires less change management down the road."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
GC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
2 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Appellate Division Greenlights State Bar's Leadership Diversity Initiatives
- 2SEC’s Latest Enforcement Actions Fuel Demand for Big Law
- 3Sterlington Brings On Former Office Leader From Ashurst
- 4DOJ Takes on Largest NFT Scheme That Points to Larger Trend
- 5Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250