Pfizer Assistant General Counsel: Climate Change Is Part of Enterprise Risk
The New York State Bar Association session addressed environmental and energy risks facing companies doing business in New York.
January 31, 2020 at 05:09 PM
4 minute read
Climate change risk management increasingly is part of enterprise risk management for global corporations such as Pfizer Inc., said the company's assistant general counsel Sally Fisk on Friday at an environmental and energy law panel at the annual meeting of the New York State Bar Association.
Pfizer, a global pharmaceutical corporation headquartered in New York City with more than 90,000 employees and scores of factories worldwide, must contend with environmental impacts on its operations, workforce and supply chain, Fisk said. She is also chief compliance counsel for Pfizer's Global Supply Division and Environmental, Health and Safety Program.
She spoke at the panel titled "Risky Business: Corporate Strategies for Addressing Environmental and Energy Challenges."
As an example of how severe weather events attributed to a changing environment can affect companies, Fisk said 2017's Hurricane Maria in the Caribbean had a $195 million financial impact on Pfizer because of its three manufacturing plants located in Puerto Rico, which was devastated by the storm, as reported in its 10-K Securities and Exchange Commission filing for the year.
She said Pfizer responded in part by doing door-to-door checks on employees and providing them with portable generators in their homes so that they could return to work.
"Lawyers must help clients assure a climate-resilient supply chain," and also ensure that climate risk analysis is performed as part of due diligence in acquisitions, she said at the meeting.
Fisk cited a recent letter by global asset manager BlackRock's CEO Larry Fink to the CEOs of the world's largest companies in which Fink said that his firm would change its investment strategy to avoid investing in companies that present "a high sustainability risk." She said the letter has been influential among corporate leaders.
At Pfizer, she said, climate change risk is being assessed as part of its enterprise and business continuity risk management process. The company conducts operational risk evaluations to study those that have the potential to substantially impact the company.
Climate change operational risk factors look at the external and operational, physical, legal and regulatory, market and technology exposures to harm, she said in a presentation for the audience at the well-attended event at the New York Hilton. The results of evaluations are reported to relevant leadership teams.
Fisk said the company has begun a project to incorporate future-climate modeling as well as historical data, such as projected sea-level rises, in computer models used in its risk management and planning as part of loss prevention.
In addition to her role at Pfizer, Fisk is a founding board member of NYC Climate Action Alliance, a nonprofit group dedicated to reducing the city's carbon emissions, according to her LinkedIn page.
The New York State Bar Association session addressed environmental and energy risks facing companies doing business in New York, including the impact of new regulations on carbon emissions, superfund toxic torts and issues surrounding legacy and emerging contaminants.
A different presentation on builder and owner development risks featured speaker Carl Hum, general counsel and senior vice president of the Real Estate Board of New York. He spoke about the expected costs for co-ops, condos and other housing developments from complying with Local Law 97, which set ambitious goals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in buildings in New York City. He said many older residential buildings may not be able to comply with the required emissions reductions by a 2030 deadline by retrofitting.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readHow Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readDog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250