1 Industry Pays Certain Women In-House Counsel More Than Men
"For the first time in any industry, we're seeing females at the managing counsel level outearn their male counterparts," said Brittney McDonough, managing director and chairwoman of health care and life sciences at BarkerGilmore.
February 05, 2020 at 04:13 PM
3 minute read
While the gender pay gap for in-house counsel stubbornly persists, something different—and, perhaps, encouraging—appears to be happening within the health care and life sciences realms.
Women at the managing counsel level for health care firms are earning 15% more than men. In life sciences, male managing counsel are paid just 2% more than women, according to a new report from legal recruitment firm BarkerGilmore.
"For the first time in any industry, we're seeing females at the managing counsel level outearn their male counterparts," said Brittney McDonough, managing director and chairwoman of health care and life sciences at BarkerGilmore.
"Health care has always predominantly been a more women-led industry and I think it comes down to education," she added. "We often see women who get into the clinical side of medicine and may come up through nursing and decide to get their J.D. They're arguably a bit further ahead for opportunities in that field."
But as women climb the corporate ladder, their pay appears to drop when compared with men at the top levels of legal departments. Female general counsel in the health care and life sciences sectors are paid 13% and 21% less than their male counterparts, respectively, according to BarkerGilmore's report.
The median total pay for women GCs in life sciences was $560,500, compared with $713,500 for men. In the health care industry, the GC gender pay gap was $401,500 to $464,000.
Overall, life sciences firms are paying women in-house counsel nearly 20% less than men while the gender pay gap is 13% at health care companies, according to the study.
The report also noted that the average base salary for in-house lawyers in both industries has increased by about 4%.
Still, the median pay for women in-house counsel across all positions in life sciences was $340,000, compared with $420,000 for men. In health care, the median pay for women was $285,000 to the men's $328,250.
Unfortunately, the gender pay disparity findings echo gaps seen throughout the in-house world in all industries, where the differences range from 15% to more than 18%, depending on the survey.
The latest findings are from BarkerGilmore's larger in-house compensation survey in 2019 of more than 2,000 U.S.-based in-house lawyers, 20% of whom work in health care or life sciences. Some other noteworthy takeaways include:
- The highest-paying in-house practice areas in health care are compliance and insurance. In life sciences, intellectual property expertise brings the biggest paychecks.
- In-house lawyers for health care firms are a bit restless and want better pay: 42% said they will likely embark on a compensation-related job hunt within the next year, compared with 31% of life sciences lawyers.
- Interestingly, though, life sciences lawyers reported that they're getting smaller raises, reporting that their base salaries increased by 4% in 2018, compared with 5.2% the previous year.
- As for those health care lawyers who are ready for a higher-paying job? They said their salaries went up 4.4% in 2018, compared with 4% the previous year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
5 minute readWells Fargo and Bank of America Agree to Pay Combined $60 Million to Settle SEC Probe
‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute readMLB's Texas Rangers Search for a New GC and a Broadcasting Deal
Trending Stories
- 1Democracy in Focus: New York State Court of Appeals Year in Review
- 2In Vape Case, A Debate Over Forum Shopping
- 3SDNY Criminal Division Deputy Chief Returns to Debevoise
- 4Brownstein Adds Former Interior Secretary, Offering 'Strategic Counsel' During New Trump Term
- 5Tragedy on I-95: Florida Lawsuit Against Horizon Freight System Could Set New Precedent in Crash Cases
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250