In-House Counsel Should Show Legal Department Data Analysis to Business Leaders
Learning how to use and analyze that data can help general counsel show their value to the C-suite was discussed the collection and analysis of data on a panel titled "Data Analytics From the Top Down: What GCs, Law Firm Leaders and the C-Suite Should Know About Data Analytics" at ALM's annual Legalweek conference at the New York Hilton Midtown on Wednesday.
February 05, 2020 at 04:21 PM
3 minute read
Companies have more data on hand than ever before. Learning how to use and analyze that data can help general counsel show their value to the C-suite.
In-house counsel and legal experts discussed the collection and analysis of data on a panel titled "Data Analytics From the Top Down: What GCs, Law Firm Leaders and the C-Suite Should Know About Data Analytics" at ALM's annual Legalweek conference at the New York Hilton Midtown on Wednesday.
Mark Smolik, the chief legal and compliance officer at DHL Supply Chain in Westerville, Ohio, said when he first started at DHL the company was outsourcing too much work to law firms.
"My initial reaction when I came to the organization was 'We have a broken model,'" Smolik said. "Twenty percent of our costs were internal and 80% were external."
Smolik said he worked with a finance team to look at the matters that were being completed by the legal department and the matters law firms were handling. He ultimately decided to bring commodity work, procurement contracts and commercial real estate to the in-house legal team at DHL.
"The visibility of that data wasn't any innovative way of thinking it was just thinking of whether we can do things better, faster and cheaper," Smolik said. "Surely we can so we brought that work in-house."
Data is the most valuable, Smolik said, when he shows business leaders how the legal department is creating value to the organization as a whole.
"Where law departments are going is, more likely than not, hiring businesspeople to lead that law department who happen to have law degrees," Smolik said.
Legal leaders who want to begin using data to find ways to create value should take a top-down approach. Jae Um, pricing director at Baker McKenzie in New York, said leaders of legal departments and law firms should take an "appreciative inquiry" when analyzing data.
"Data is not magic. It is work. It costs time and money and there is risk involved," Um said.
Taking a bottom-up approach when analyzing data can be "perilous and time-consuming," she said, adding that it's easy to spend too much time analyzing the wrong data sets.
"One of the problems that we can't see is one of data sufficiency," Um said. "We do have a lot of data, but when you frame up the problem that you're trying to solve sometimes you don't have all of the data you need to solve that particular problem."
Um noted the best approach is beginning at a point of how the analysis will work and contemplating what information is needed to complete the analysis.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDigging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
5 minute readElaine Darr Brings Transformation and Value to DHL's Business
PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250