New Guide Helps In-House Counsel Handle Evolving Environmental Regulations
In-house counsel's challenge of advising business based on changing environmental law is what led Lex Mundi, along with its international partners, to create the Lex Mundi Global Climate Change Law Guide.
February 11, 2020 at 05:29 PM
3 minute read
Keeping up with changing environmental policies and regulations across the globe can be daunting. In-house counsel's challenge of advising business based on those changes is what led Houston-based Lex Mundi, along with its international partners, to create the Lex Mundi Global Climate Change Law Guide.
The free guide, made available on Tuesday, allows in-house counsel to look up environmental regulations, greenhouse gas emission trading schemes, energy efficiency measures, renewable energy sources, financial institutional measures and prominent litigation worldwide. It also allows users to create a custom side-by-side report comparing different jurisdictions to help guide business decisions.
"Most jurisdictions do have some long-term measures in places to reduce emissions," Lauren Smith, international business development manager at Lex Mundi, said. "That's why we developed this for in-house counsel. So they can be aware and do some risk mitigation analysis with outside counsel before committing to business decisions."
Marloes Brans, a partner and head of climate change at Lex Mundi member firm Houthoff in Amsterdam, said in-house counsel have shown an increased interest in climate change issues in the past year.
"I think it being in the media accelerates it to the top of the agenda for general counsel," Brans said in an interview with Corporate Counsel.
She explained that, in conjunction with Lex Mundi, Houthoff hosted a commission on governance last year and the main discussion point, along with carbon dioxide reduction and soil contamination, was how to implement environmentally friendly measures that put companies in compliance with the various regulations worldwide, showing the need for a guide like this.
"What we're noticing is that there is a lot surrounding climate change," Brans said. "They [general counsel] hear that a lot is going in the litigation and regulatory aspects. I think the guide is a very good tool to provide some sense of what's going on."
Because of litigation on environmental issues, the regulations are fluid and continuously changing and the stakes to that kind of litigation are getting higher. In December, for example, the Supreme Court of the Netherlands in The State of the Netherlands v. Stichting Urgenda ordered the government to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 25% from 1990 levels by the end of 2020, Brans explained. It is the first of its kind where a government has been ordered to reduce emissions.
"That is a groundbreaking case and is an example of a strict outcome from litigation," Brans said.
As regulations continue to expand and more suits are filed regarding climate change, the guide will be updated. Smith said Lex Mundi will be adding regulations and significant litigation from different jurisdictions as time goes on.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readDog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Bonus Parade Continues, With Additional Firms Matching Milbank
- 2Contract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
- 3European, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
- 4UPS Agrees to $45M Settlement With SEC Over Valuation Claim
- 5For Midsize Law Firms, Curbing Boys-Club Culture Starts with Diversity at the Top
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250