Alphabet, HP, Cisco and Tesla in Top 10 of 'Cleanest' Global Companies
The Carbon Clean 200 ranks publicly traded companies that are leading the way on clean energy issues in the first quarter of 2020 and offers several key takeaways for general counsel and their companies.
February 13, 2020 at 04:56 PM
4 minute read
Of the top carbon clean companies in a new report, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. ranked first while four U.S. firms—Alphabet Inc., HP Inc., Cisco Systems Inc. and Tesla Inc.—rated in the top 10.
The report, Carbon Clean 200, ranks publicly traded companies that are leading the way on clean energy issues in the first quarter of 2020. It offers several key takeaways for general counsel and their companies, including that the cleanest 200 corporations financially outperformed 100 of the largest oil, gas and coal companies over the past three years.
In fact, the Clean 200 has outperformed the MSCI ACWI Global Energy Index, an energy index for the largest oil, gas and coal companies, by a factor of four, 29.6% to 6.7% since the first Clean 200 report in July 2016.
The report was prepared by As you Sow, a nonprofit group advocating corporate accountability on environmental and other issues; and by Corporate Knights, a Toronto-based for-profit media and research company that focuses "clean capitalism."
Toby Heaps, CEO of Corporate Knights and co-author of the report, said, "Investors are starting to really wake up to this new narrative—that the fossil fuel industry growth story is coming to an end." Heaps spoke during a webcast introducing the report Thursday.
"Big money is waking up to this and investing in green investments," Heaps added. "Smart money is now going big on clean energy."
Andrew Behar, CEO of As You Sow and co-author of the report, said, "In 2016 people were saying, 'If we divest fossil fuels, there is nothing to invest in.' We created the Clean 200 to show investors around the world" that there are profitable investments to be made for a clean energy future.
Heaps added, "Given that oil prices rose by 30% in the past year, it is surprising that oil company stocks have performed so poorly," suggesting that investors are breaking up with fossil fuels.
The report and webcast showed that Europe had 69 companies on the list, followed by the U.S. with 39, Japan with 28 and China with 27.
Besides the Taiwan and U.S. companies in the top 10, the report also ranked Siemens AG of Germany at No. 3, Toyota Motor Corp. of Japan at No. 4, Iberdrola SA of Spain at No. 6, Schneider Electric of France at No. 9, and Unilever of the U.K. and The Netherlands at No. 10.
Of the companies on the 200 list, the most were in the industrial sector at 79, followed by 44 in information technology, and 26 in materials, a category that includes recycled metals and paper.
Heaps explained that the Clean 200 consists of companies with more than $1 billion in revenue and more than 10% clean energy revenues. He said 59 companies that met such criteria were excluded from the list, however, after being screened on other key factors that included social responsibility, corporate governance and sustainable sourcing.
Companies were dropped, for example, if they paid fines, penalties or settlements in excess of 1% of their revenues; if they were found to have human rights violations; or if they used forced child labor in their supply chains.
Some companies were excluded just based on the products they make or sell: tobacco, weapons, natural gas and nuclear energy, for instance. Neither natural gas nor nuclear energy are considered "clean" energy, explained research manager Wendy Shen-Juarez of Corporate Knights.
Shen-Juarez said her company developed the clean revenue metric three years ago as a synthesis of revenue, best practices and several other sources. Where possible, the researchers consult with the companies themselves, she added.
The report concludes, "The fundamental story is that the march from high carbon energy to clean energy is only quickening driven mainly by economics, risk, and increasingly supported by other social forces from Greta [Thunberg, climate advocate] to Pope Francis; from Extinction Rebellion to The European Central Bank."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
$17B Episcopal Church Pension Fund Hires New Legal Chief as Staff Changes Continue
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250