Wells Fargo Agrees to $3B Penalty to Resolve Fake Bank Account Scandal
Bank CEO Charles Scharf: "The conduct ... and the past culture that gave rise to it are reprehensible and wholly inconsistent with the values on which Wells Fargo was built."
February 21, 2020 at 05:35 PM
4 minute read
Wells Fargo & Co. agreed Friday to pay a massive $3 billion penalty and to accept a three-year deferred prosecution agreement to avoid a criminal trial over its fake bank account scandal.
CEO Charles Scharf issued a statement saying, "The conduct at the core of today's settlements—and the past culture that gave rise to it—are reprehensible and wholly inconsistent with the values on which Wells Fargo was built."
Scharf said over the past three years "we've made fundamental changes to our business model, compensation programs, leadership and governance [but] there's still more work we must do to rebuild the trust we lost."
The deal was announced at a press conference by U.S. Attorney Nicola Hanna in Los Angeles.
Hanna said for 15 years the bank "pursued an aggressive business strategy, selling additional banking products to customers, including checking and saving accounts. This volume-based growth plan emphasized loading up each customer with as many products as possible [and] permeated all aspects of community banking business."
This cross-sell strategy, he said, led to "widespread abuses, unethical conduct and illegal activity," including the opening of bank accounts without customers' knowledge or consent.
The settlement resolved three separate investigations, including a criminal one by the Department of Justice into fake accounts; a civil one by the Justice Department into false bank records; and a civil one by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission into misleading investors.
The commission's $500 million civil penalty, which is included in the $3 billion, will go to harmed investors, said Stephanie Avakian, co-head of the enforcement division at the SEC.
Hanna said some investigations are ongoing and Wells Fargo is cooperating, but would not disclose details.
In reaching the settlement, he said prosecutors considered past and ongoing cooperation; remedial actions already taken, including sufficient changes to upper management and a reconstituted board of directors; enhancement of its compliance program; compensation to customers who were victimized; and the bank's complete admission of wrongdoing and acceptance of responsibility.
Since the scandal broke, the company has replaced its board chairman, its CEO twice, its general counsel and numerous other executives.
Last November Wells Fargo announced that new general counsel Allen Parker, who had been serving as interim CEO and was leading reforms, was leaving. Parker agreed to stay on as general counsel until March 31, presumably to oversee Friday's settlement.
The company has yet to name a new general counsel.
In addition, in February 2018 the Federal Reserve imposed an unprecedented asset freeze, in the form of a cease and desist consent order, that limits the San Francisco-based bank's growth to its December 2017 level. In effect, the order halted most lending and most growth until the bank raised its corporate governance standards to acceptable levels.
Wells Fargo said the $3 billion penalty was fully accrued as of last Dec. 31.
At least one consumer rights group, Public Citizen, quickly criticized the settlement. "Any resolution for Wells Fargo's massive, management-directed misconduct must hold individuals to account," the group said in a statement. "Wells Fargo's fake account scandal is as clear and understandable as pickpocketing."
It went on to say criminal violations should be deterred through criminal enforcement actions, not deferred prosecution agreements. "Protecting Wells Fargo from the consequences of its wrongdoing is not the DOJ's job," it concluded.
Read More:
Former Wells Fargo GC Vows to Fight New Charges in Sham-Account Scandal
Wells Fargo Names Outsider as CEO, Praises General Counsel Allen Parker for His Interim Leadership
Haunted by the Past, Wells Fargo Takes $1.6B Legal Charge
With General Counsel in Control, Wells Fargo Reports No Progress on Naming CEO
Wells Fargo General Counsel-Turned-CEO Creates New Regulatory and Compliance Group
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllVisa's Defense of DOJ Antitrust Case Suffers Setback After Court Denies Motion to Dismiss
Wells Fargo and Bank of America Agree to Pay Combined $60 Million to Settle SEC Probe
Amex Latest Target as Regulators Scrutinize Whether Credit Card Issuers Deliver on Rewards Promises
Former Capital One Deputy GC Takes Legal Reins of AIG Spinoff
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250