Legal Departments Demanding Diverse Slate of Candidates for In-House Roles
"No one is saying we're not hiring the best person," Verona Dorch, chief legal officer of Peabody Energy Corp. in St. Louis, said. "Let's take that discussion off of the table because I think that floats into an unconscious bias area."
February 27, 2020 at 05:11 PM
4 minute read
Legal leaders looking to do more internally on diversity and inclusion are beginning to demand that candidate pools be diverse and are working creatively to eliminate implicit and unconscious biases.
Verona Dorch, the chief legal officer of St. Louis-based Peabody Energy Inc., told Corporate Counsel in an interview that she made it clear to both internal and external recruiters that she wanted to have a diverse slate of candidates for interviews when she started her role in 2015. Dorch said she no longer wanted recruiters to say they will look for the "best person for the job" and not keep diversity in mind.
"No one is saying we're not hiring the best person," Dorch said. "Let's take that discussion off of the table because I think that floats into an unconscious bias area."
She said the search firms that she works with for in-house hires are committed to diversity and bringing diverse candidates with a talented background to her.
Much of the discussion on diversity and inclusion has been focused on law firms. However, Diversity Lab started the Mansfield Rule for legal departments. The rule requires the 22 corporate legal departments who signed up in April 2019 to track the metrics of their candidate pool. Just past the midway point of the yearlong pilot program, Lisa Kirby, chief intelligence and knowledge sharing officer at Diversity Lab, said there has been a change in the way of thinking within many of the participating legal departments.
"Most legal departments were not previously tracking candidate pools," Kirby said. "That has been a significant cultural change."
Although Diversity Lab has not yet formally compiled all of the data, Leila Hock, director of legal department partnerships and inclusion initiatives at Diversity Lab, said many of the larger legal departments that have help from human resources or legal operations are having an easier time tracking those metrics.
Hock said it is easier to track candidate pools when it "is not resting on one lawyer."
A data point participants must strive to comply with is to have 50% of people from underrepresented groups interviewed for 70% of leadership roles within the department. Jim Chosy, general counsel of U.S. Bank in Minneapolis, said he has made that part of his legal department's hiring policy.
Chosy, who said his legal department was early to sign on to the Mansfield Rule, is now keeping the required metrics to improve diversity. He also said he has a method in place to eliminate bias in the interview process.
"One thing we do to rinse out biases is to conduct interviews in a panel approach," Chosy said. "A panel of us speaking to one candidate helps to eliminate, to the extent that we can, any unconscious bias that one individual manager might bring."
Recruitment, Chosy said, is sometimes a challenge because he does not often hire someone straight from law school. To diversify the pool of candidates for in-house roles, he and his team have begun to develop connections with affinity bar associations.
"That has been a terrific source for finding candidates," Chosy said.
Where general counsel could improve on diversity is making their firms more accountable on their own diversity and inclusion efforts. Chosy said he is asking his firms to become Mansfield Rule-certified since his legal department is working toward the program's goals.
Dorch, however, said corporate legal leaders need to show their firms they are not reaching for a minimum standard on diversity.
"I think what is going to start to move the needle is when certain firms start to get fired by GCs because they're not living up to the diversity requirements," Dorch said. "I think until we articulate that is part of the reason [firms are fired] it is not going to change."
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
Ben & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute read'It's Not About Speed': Forging Strong Legal Department-Law Firm Relationships Starts With Humility, Trust
6 minute readNLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 2Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 3McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
- 4Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
- 5Schools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250