SeaWorld in Orlando. (Photo: Peter Etchells/Shutterstock.com)SeaWorld's Legal Expenses Led to $24M Fourth Quarter Loss
SeaWorld's sales and attendance were at record levels, but the company said legal costs led to a fourth quarter loss of $24.2 million. The costs stem from a class action settlement of a suit related to a film about Tilikum the whale.
February 27, 2020 at 01:10 PM
2 minute read
Despite increased sales and attendance, legal costs weighed down SeaWorld Entertainment Inc.'s fourth quarter finances, resulting in a $24.2 million loss.
The Orlando-based theme park operator had announced Feb. 11 that it would pay $65 million to settle a class action suit filed in 2014, as well as a related derivative suit. It said about $45.5 million of that would come from insurance.
On Wednesday, SeaWorld said it took a fourth quarter legal charge of $32.1 million. It also said it had earlier paid $5.1 million in related legal fees.
Neither the company nor general counsel Tony Taylor immediately responded to messages seeking to clarify the legal expenses. Taylor has been with the company since 2010.
SeaWorld has said the settlement was not an admission of wrongdoing. The company was represented by attorneys from Simpson Thacher & Bartlett.
The class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California alleged that SeaWorld violated securities laws and misled investors over the revenue impact on its business of a 2013 documentary called "Blackfish."
The film documents the captivity and treatment of Tilikum, a performing orca whale held at SeaWorld and involved in the deaths of three people. Tilikum died in 2017.
In a statement about the film, SeaWorld said it was "inaccurate and misleading and, regrettably, exploits a tragedy." The company said the documentary withheld key facts such as how many animals SeaWorld rescues, rehabilitates and returns to the wild each year and how much it spends on conservation and research.
In September 2018, the company, along with former CEO James Atchison and its vice president of communications agreed to pay over $5 million to settle fraud charges by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for misleading investors about the film's impact. SeaWorld was penalized $4 million and Atchison $1 million, without admitting or denying guilt. The vice president of communications, who said he made statements on orders from Atchison, agreed to pay about $100.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
As Uncertainty Hovers Over PGA Merger, LIV Golf Hires Entertainment Industry Veteran as Legal Chief
A+E Networks CLO Retiring, Capping Storied, 40-Year Career in Entertainment Law
Australian Gambling-Machine Giant Hires Insider as CLO, Relocates Her to Las Vegas
Attorney Gives Up 25-Year Law Firm Career to Become CLO of Seattle's Pro Soccer Teams
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Davis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
- 2Construction Fall Nets $2.3 Million Settlement After Trial Begins
- 3By the Numbers: The 2024 LTN Law Firm Tech Survey
- 4Can The Threat of a Bar Complaint Be a Settlement Tool?
- 5Sentencing Commission Addresses Inconsistent Definitions of “Loss”
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
