Coronavirus Fraud: A GC's Guide to Potential Schemes
Fear and confusion create a climate ripe for fraud. And global companies with deep pockets are prime targets. Here are some potential schemes in house counsel should prepare for.
February 28, 2020 at 09:43 AM
5 minute read
As COVID-19 has spread beyond China, capturing news headlines and shaking financial markets, companies have put together action plans to address the impact of the epidemic on their business—focusing on areas ranging from supply chain management to employee safety. Recently, the U.S. Center for Disease Control confirmed that, as many companies had forecasted, the virus reached U.S. shores, causing additional business and market disruption (try to find hand sanitizer or a N95 rated mask at the local grocery store).
Companies with effective risk management processes are making preparations to address how the virus will impact their business ecosystem. But corporate leaders aren't the only ones making preparations. Global criminal organizations continually scour the news for potential fraud schemes. Fear and confusion create a climate ripe for fraud. And global companies with deep pockets are prime targets. Here are some potential schemes in house counsel should prepare for.
Corporate IT Systems/Electronic Intrusion/Compromise
In house lawyers should be on the lookout for communications (e.g., emails or texts) that seek to dupe employees and contain phishing or exploitation content. The communication may say something about COVID-19 and then request employees to take specific actions.
Here are some examples:
- "Your office location is closed, please remote in today (see hyperlink)."
- "Because of COVID-19, payroll is making adjustments and we need to update account information (see hyperlink)."
- "All employees are asked to sign in (see hyperlink) and update their wellness status."
- "Relief donations are being solicited (see hyperlink)."
There are endless variations of this low-tech phishing effort, but the result is the same: leverage news media and employee awareness of the virus and insert the fraud scheme into the company's effort to remediate the impact on the company. The result of this exercise is collecting useful data from the employee that can be used for fraudulent purposes (personal identification information, account details, and other sensitive corporate data).
Sophisticated criminals may use social media platforms such as LinkedIn or Facebook to add social engineering elements to the scheme. They may know who employees are "connected" with and what type of things they post about. Enter a random employee in LinkedIn and the site also pulls up other LinkedIn users commonly viewed by whoever looked at the employee. All of this data maybe useful for fraudsters.
Counterfeit Products
Fear creates supply shortages. In Houston this week, stores were selling out of water and hand sanitizer. If you want a N95 rated mask, forget it. Criminals will see another opportunity here to step in with counterfeit or defective products. Potential fake products include safety masks, vaccines, safety, prevention and detection products, and cleaning or sanitation products.
This effort can target victims within and outside a company, but company employees should be aware that when there are supply shortages or crises, criminal organizations will try to sell counterfeit items that at best may be ineffective, or at worst, harmful to use.
Fake Solicitations
Fake charity schemes may come in the form of a phishing scheme or a more sophisticated fake charity operation with efforts targeting employees and soliciting donations for sick employees, family members, or other victims in different countries. Anytime there is a crisis, fraudulent charities immediately spring into action.
Platform Consumer Fraud Risk
If your business serves as a platform for consumers that maybe victimized by COVID-19-related fraud schemes, the U.S. government scrutinizes companies that have benefitted from fraud schemes—asking about their controls and compliance processes to prevent fraud and mitigate known risks. Any company with consumer risk should have a consumer fraud compliance program to address the risks. COVID-19 will provide a different narrative for criminals to perpetrate fraud across different platforms. Companies with this core risk to their business should assess their existing controls and whether the COVID-19 narrative enhances their risk (and, if so, how they can mitigate this enhanced risk).
The threats to companies posed by criminal organizations has not changed in the past few decades. Criminals have responded to globalization and digitization with different schemes that leverage the tools companies use to operate (e.g., communication platforms, global financial intuitions), but the goal has always been to take as much money from corporate victims as they can. The challenge for good corporate governance and the leadership team is to educate employees on this risk and develop good governance and compliance frameworks to protect the business and its stakeholders.
Ryan McConnell and Matthew Boyden are lawyers at R. McConnell Group, a compliance and investigations/criminal defense boutique law firm in Houston Texas. McConnell and Boyden are also both former federal prosecutors with collective experience that includes thousands of complex white-collar investigations. McConnell is a former assistant U.S. Attorney in Houston who has taught criminal procedure and corporate compliance at the University of Houston Law Center. Boyden spent 20 years as a Postal Inspector before joining the U.S. Attorney's Office and is a recognized international expert in business email compromise and payment diversion techniques. He has significant experience investigating cases involving the "dark web," cryptocurrency, and energy sector matters. Send column ideas to [email protected]. Follow the firm on Twitter at @rmcconnellgroup.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Dismisses Defamation Suit by New York Philharmonic Oboist Accused of Sexual Misconduct
- 2California Court Denies Apple's Motion to Strike Allegations in Gender Bias Class Action
- 3US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 4Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 5African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250