Google's Mary Shen O'Carroll: Some Firms Don't Realize They Can Be Replaced
At the ABA TechShow, the director of Google's legal operations and president of CLOC broke down attributes of law firms that are deniers, experimenters and committed, plus how each may weather the new legal services ecosystem.
February 28, 2020 at 05:00 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
To a room packed with ABA TechShow attendees, Google's director of legal operations and Corporate Legal Operations Consortium (CLOC) president Mary Shen O'Carroll warned that the cultural and technological disruption reshaping the legal industry may leave some complacent law firms behind.
O'Carroll, who was awarded Legal Department Operations Director of the Year by Legaltech News in 2016, said you can categorize a law firm's attitude toward innovation into three buckets: deniers, experimenters and committed.
O'Carroll described "deniers" as firms that see the advancements of legal technology and the emergence of alternative legal service providers (ALSP) as fads and point to their firm's recent wildly profitable year as evidence. O'Carroll said law firms with that outlook are sadly mistaken.
"Remember, for the first time ever you have a new set of competitors who are attacking this problem from every angle," she said. "You have growing corporate legal departments, you have the Big Four, new tech and who knows what will emerge in the years to come. The wave coming at you is very real."
She noted those new delivery models can mirror a firm's speed and price, and "as soon as they can deliver and prove the quality is as good, I would say there's something to worry about."
While O'Carroll said she sees a lot of firms fall into the deniers classification, she also encounters "experimenters" who are "dipping their toe" into innovation and "treating innovation as a project."
Those law firms are acknowledging innovation can't be ignored by the firm, but their innovation is siloed from the practice of law at the firm. "It's small incremental changes in the face of big disruptive changes," she explained.
The corporate clients of experimenter firms are demanding efficient, new legal service delivery models while their outside counsel is largely offering symbolic, superficial innovation, O'Carroll said.
O'Carroll described "committed" firms as the law firms who aren't threatened by the evolution of legal services. Instead, those firms are taking on the challenge of understanding and profiting from the expanding menu of legal tech and service providers. On these firms, she noted, "They do exist, and I embrace them."
Committed firms' attributes include focusing their strategy on technology by investing or even developing legal tech and harnessing data and gaining analytics. Forward-thinking firms are also most likely to focus on scalability and partner with ALSPs and hire technologists, legal ops and other new roles to power enhanced legal services, she added.
Law firms are likely to change and embrace innovation when they aren't afraid to fail when exploring new solutions.
It's likely once a large law firm adopts major innovation and succeeds, other law firms will follow that model, O'Carroll said. If not, clients have a plethora of options to turn to.
"There is a shift in the model where the law firm used to be the dominant, undisputed leader in the [legal] space," she explained. "Now the law firm is one player in what can be called an ecosystem."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHealth Care Giants Sue FTC, Allege Lina Khan Using Loaded Process to Vilify Pharmacy Benefit Managers
3 minute readPorsche's Venture Capital Arm Adds General Counsel From Clifford Chance
How a 200,000-Worker Global Enterprise Took Down the Silos and Made ESG Its Mission
4 minute readCorporate Counsel's 2024 Award Winners Performed Legal Wizardry, Gave a Hand Up to Others
Trending Stories
- 1Publication of Information Regarding Client Matters
- 2The State of Cost Recovery — Post COVID
- 3Why Is It Becoming More Difficult for Businesses to Mandate Arbitration of Employment Disputes?
- 4The Whys and Hows of a Mediator’s Proposal
- 5Litigators of the Week: A Trade Secret Win at the ITC for Viking Over Promising Potential Liver Drug
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250