How Are Global Companies Dealing With the Coronavirus?
A new survey from the American Chamber of Commerce in China shows that coronavirus woes are bringing economic gloom and uncertainty to international businesses, many of which say it's simply too soon to know how bad things will get.
February 28, 2020 at 02:47 PM
4 minute read
The American Chamber of Commerce in China has released the results of a study that provides some new insights on the impact that the coronavirus is having on its member companies, a roster of global firms that includes Boeing Co., General Motors Co., IBM Corp. and Microsoft Corp.
Of the nearly 170 companies that participated in the survey earlier this month, 44% said they now have a negative outlook on the U.S.-China bilateral relationship as a result of uncertainty swirling around the COVID-19 outbreak.
For some companies, the economic outlook under the coronavirus cloud appears to be bleak: 10% reported that they are losing about $71,500 a day; 12% expect project delays to continue through the summer; and one-fifth said their 2020 revenues will decline more than 50% if the outbreak extends through Aug. 30, according to the report.
The unpredictability of the situation has many companies staying in wait-and-see mode. More than 40% said it was simply too soon to determine how the virus will affect their industry's forecasted market growth this year, though 48% were bracing for some level of decrease.
Half of respondents also believed that it was too early to know how the situation will affect their planned investments, while 25% reported that they were going to stay the course and maintain existing investment plans.
"There is, in the short term, a clear and significant negative impact to member company operations, through travel disruptions, reduced staff productivity, increased costs, significant drops in revenue, and more," AmCham China chairman Greg Gilligan said in a statement. "However, for most of our members, it is still too early to tell how significant the long-term impact will be."
Julie Nevins, special counsel at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan in Miami who was familiar with but not involved in the study, noted that companies might also be grappling with another unknown: whether their insurance policies cover losses from coronavirus-related business disruptions.
"The hurdle is that most business interruption policies require as a trigger for coverage physical damage to property," she said. "It's hard to see how the coronavirus causes physical damage to property."
Companies might argue that the property in question was contaminated, which could constitute physical damage. Some courts, Nevins said, have held that Legionnaires' disease, a form of pneumonia that can affect water and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, constitutes physical property damage for the purposes of insurance coverage.
"Time will tell whether those arguments are raised and how they fare in the context of the coronavirus," she added.
Despite all the unknowns at the moment, companies, especially public firms, still need to figure out how to properly disclose the risks that they're facing.
"We live in such a litigious society that there may be investor claims down the road" for nondisclosure, Nevis said. "That could be another thing to consider."
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHealth Care Giants Sue FTC, Allege Lina Khan Using Loaded Process to Vilify Pharmacy Benefit Managers
3 minute readPorsche's Venture Capital Arm Adds General Counsel From Clifford Chance
How a 200,000-Worker Global Enterprise Took Down the Silos and Made ESG Its Mission
4 minute readCorporate Counsel's 2024 Award Winners Performed Legal Wizardry, Gave a Hand Up to Others
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250