In-House Contract Lawyers Explore What Tech Can Do for Them
When an event happens, "you need to know what clauses you have in contracts that alter your risk," one expert says. "And you want AI doing that, not an army of interns in your legal department."
February 28, 2020 at 05:39 PM
4 minute read
Corporate counsel John Griffin of Alliance Data Systems Corp. envisions a day soon when smart computer programs can peruse thousands of company contracts and flag when there's a problem created by changing events.
On Friday he was one of 580 tech-curious professionals—many of them in-house counsel—who attended the Conga Connect conference in Orlando, Florida, focusing on contract management. They worked in user groups, networked with other professionals, and listened to keynote speakers like the Daymond John of "Shark Tank," who welcomed "my fellow sharks" who like him, he said, are also disruptive "agents for change."
In the case of in-house counsel, they often are agents who have to deal with change. Griffin said he is one of about 50 in-house lawyers for Columbus, Ohio-based Alliance Data, with about 15 being contract attorneys.
When there is an event that could impact a company's contracts, Griffin said it seems like it would be simple to figure out that impact. "But it's complex," he told Corporate Counsel. "You must legally evaluate each clause in tens of thousands of contracts."
He said he believes "there is going to be increased [use] of machine learning and predictive analytics" to pull clauses out of contracts that are impacted by an event.
"Time is precious" in a legal department, Griffin noted. "The biggest thing is folks trying to be more adept at using technology, and seeing [new] ways we can use it."
Mason White, vice president of product management at Conga, which sponsored the tech conference, agreed. "We are going to see a lot more AI [artificial intelligence] being brought into products like ours," White said. Conga is a Colorado-based technology and services company that focuses on contract life cycle management.
When there is an event such as Brexit or loss of LIBOR or the European Union's new General Data Protection Regulation, White explained, in-house counsel need the ability to figure out how the event will impact its contracts.
"For example, when interest rates are no longer [indexed to] LIBOR, you need to know what clauses you have in contracts that alter your risk. And you want AI doing that, not an army of interns in your legal department."
White said in-house counsel will benefit because soon "they'll be able to have machine learning algorithms cruise through those contracts" and explain that a clause adds this specific value, or that particular risk.
The conference drew attendees from numerous industries and across various roles, including legal operations, in-house contract counsel, sales and sales ops.
But it was in-house lawyers like Griffin, or Patrick Anderson and Zack Chalgren of Agiliti Health Inc., who came to learn what smarter systems could do for their legal departments and their companies.
Anderson, who has been with Minneapolis-based Agiliti about a year, explained, "We want to know what we can do better. We don't know what we don't know, but they [conference programs] can tell us what we need to know and what we don't."
Agiliti services, rents and manages medical equipment nationwide. It has a "small and tight" four-lawyer legal department, they said.
Chalgren, who has been with the company for about two and a half years, said, "We are open to new ways of doing things. If there is a faster, easier, better way to automate these agreements, we want to know about that and implement it. We can provide more value to our business by turning out contracts faster."
One new technology not on their radar yet is blockchain. The attorneys all said they have not seen any practical use so far for blockchain technology in their businesses. Conga's White said he also is not seeing any demand for blockchain.
"We keep evaluating blockchain and keep looking at ways that it might be commercially pragmatic for us," he said. "But there seem to be easier and cheaper ways to achieve what it does. Customers are just not coming to us and asking for blockchain."
White said mostly he has watched other companies take on what he called blockchain vanity projects or blockchain tourism—where they take a little trip with the new technology "and then come back to the old way."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGlobal Software Firm Trying to Jump-Start Growth Hands CLO Post to 3-Time Legal Chief
Meta Workers Aren't of One Mind on Company's Retreat From DEI, Fact-Checking
Ad Agency Legal Chief Scores $12M Golden Parachute in $13B Sale to Rival
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1LexisNexis Announces Public Availability of Personalized AI Assistant Protégé
- 2Some Thoughts on What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
- 3Artificial Wisdom or Automated Folly? Practical Considerations for Arbitration Practitioners to Address the AI Conundrum
- 4The New Global M&A Kings All Have Something in Common
- 5Big Law Aims to Make DEI Less Divisive in Trump's Second Term
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250