Law School Survival in the 21st Century
Most businesses today operate essentially in the global marketplace and face both U.S. and international business/legal issues and challenges. Their legal counsels will also face the same issues, so curriculum(s) must be expanded to make sure that students understand the issues described in this article and are reasonably prepared to handle them when they hit the workplace.
February 28, 2020 at 10:57 AM
3 minute read
Most businesses today operate essentially in the global marketplace and face both U.S. and international business/legal issues and challenges. Their legal counsels will also face the same issues, so curriculum(s) must be expanded to make sure that students understand the issues described in this article and are reasonably prepared to handle them when they hit the workplace. The goal of this article is to help companies to avoid liability.
The most critical business/legal issues I see facing [and will continue to face] businesses, along with some tips on how to address these issues, which are:
Bribery. Under FCPA [Foreign Corrupt Practices Act], a violation, either by the company or its reseller(s), could be very costly. DOJ [Department of Justice] along with the SEC [Securities and Exchange Commission] have primary enforcement oversight of FCPA violations. DOJ recently introduced 2 settlement options, DPA's [Deferred Prosecution Agreement] and NPA's [Non-Prosecution Agreement]. Counsel needs to understand the consequences of accepting these settlement arrangements. Also, many other countries have implement similar laws so a company can be hit from both ends.
Data Privacy. In May 2018, the EU [European Union] implemented a very complex 'General Data Protection Regulation' [GDPR] protecting EU consumers' data. Companies doing business in Europe must strictly comply with GDPR or face sever financial penalties. Also, on Jan 1, 2020 the California Consumer Privacy Act [CCPA], goes into effect which is also very complex. To minimize the company's financial impact arbitration is recommended, also, a Privacy Officer should be appointed as the go to person. Lacking a federal privacy act, many other states are working on similar legislation, so companies will need to understand and comply with a host of differing state privacy requirements.
Technology Ownership. AI [Artificial Intelligence] is currently dominating global business by developing APS, platforms, programs, tools, etc. related to Blockchain, IoT [Internet of Things], ML [Machine Learning], and VR/AR [Virtual and Augmented Reality]. IP litigation is very time consuming and costly, so this raises the question: should AI (or parts of it) be considered as 'open source'. [VIA Technologies has designated its AI -APP as open source]. Sexual Misconduct, bullying and sexual harassment in the workplace is out of control. Can it be stopped in the age of the #MeToo movement, probably not, can it be minimized, maybe, having a [very] strong company policy and including the so-called 'Weinstein' disclosure clause(s) in all appropriate corporate agreements may help minimize a company's financial exposure.
There are numerous other issues which have been discussed in various articles that law schools need to consider in order to attract and retain top students. Legal education needs to keep pace with the 21st century marketplace.
Joe Valof, Esq. is the founder of OnLine Counsel [a ALSP], and author of 'Marketing In The 21st Century: Adjusting To The Digital Age' and Ethics in Corporate America: A Guide to Avoiding Liability.'
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllImmigration Under the Trump Administration: Five Things to Expect in the First 90 Days
8 minute readSteward Health CEO Saga Signals Escalation of Coercive Congressional Oversight Against Private Parties
6 minute readTen Best Practices to Protect Your Organization Against Cyber Threats
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250