William Niles. Courtesy photoBrinks Home Security Names General Counsel Interim CEO
William Niles takes over for Jeff Gardner, who stepped down as CEO and president Feb. 27, ending a four-year tenure at Brinks, a subsidiary of Monitronics International Inc.
March 02, 2020 at 04:18 PM
2 minute read
Brinks Home Security has tapped the Dallas-based company's general counsel and chief transformation officer to serve as interim CEO.
William Niles takes over for Jeff Gardner, who stepped down as CEO and president Feb. 27, ending a four-year tenure at Brinks, a subsidiary of Monitronics International Inc.
Gardner's departure follows the company's emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy last year. The firm, one of the largest home security and monitoring companies in the U.S., eliminated more than $800 million in debt as part of its reorganization.
"Brinks Home Security is an exceptional company and leading the team has been an honor," Gardner said in a statement announcing his exit. "I am proud of what we have accomplished together and our deep commitment to serving our customers."
The company's board of directors named Niles as interim CEO. He also will continue to serve as GC and CTO while Brinks carries out a "comprehensive search to name a permanent CEO." His promotion, while potentially temporary, comes as more in-house leaders are being elevated to the CEO's office as part of a trend that appeared to accelerate in 2019.
A Brinks representative declined to provide details about why Gardner stepped down. Niles was not available for an interview.
Niles joined Brinks in September 2019 after having served as CEO of Ascent Capital Group Inc., the parent company of Brinks Home Security and Monitronics. Before he was elevated to CEO, he served as Ascent's executive vice president, general counsel and secretary.
Niles also served as executive VP and GC of Ascent Media Group from 2002 until it was sold in 2010.
Earlier in his career, he worked as an associate at Baker McKenzie and as a partner with Stein & Kahan. He is a graduate of the Georgetown University Law Center.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Contract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute read
How Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute read
Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute read
Dog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Law Firm Real Estate Strategy: Attorney Offices Are Out, Conference Rooms Are In
- 2AI Governance In Practice
- 3Section 1782 Practice Pointers From Recent Decisions
- 4Democratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
- 5Decision of the Day: Split Circuit Panel Bars Enforcement of Ivory Law's 'Display Restriction' on Antique Group Members
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
