Breaking Down the COVID-19 Coronavirus Challenges: A Q&A With MaineHealth Corporate Counsel Elisabeth Belmont
Belmont discusses how in-house counsel at hospitals and health care systems such as her own are responding to the outbreak in the U.S. of COVID-19, the novel coronavirus, or should be. She lectures and writes often on emergency preparedness.
March 06, 2020 at 02:34 PM
7 minute read
Elisabeth Belmont is corporate counsel at MaineHealth in Portland, Maine, the state's largest integrated health system with combined annual revenues in excess of $2 billion, a position that she has held since 1998.
As of March 5, testing had not turned up any confirmed cases in Maine of COVID-19, the novel coronavirus first detected in China, but a few cases had been detected in neighboring New Hampshire and Massachusetts, and state and health care officials in Maine were preparing for its possible arrival with about a dozen Mainers being tested on Friday. MaineHealth also serves northern New Hampshire.
Prior to attaining her current role, Belmont served in a similar role at Maine Medical Center, the system's flagship hospital prior to a corporate reorganization. Belmont is a past president of the American Health Lawyers Association, where she's also held other leadership posts, and is author and editor of publications on emergency and pan-flu preparedness, among others. She lectures nationally on emergency preparedness.
Corporate Counsel asked Belmont about how in-house counsel at hospitals and health care organizations such as her own are responding to the outbreak in the United States of COVID-19 or should be responding. Some of her emailed comments have been edited for length.
Corporate Counsel: What is the in-house counsel's specific role in a health care setting in the context of the current COVID-19 coronavirus outbreak?
Elisabeth Belmont: Corporate counsel advise health care clients on the best means of discharging their legal obligations given the impending risk of a coronavirus outbreak or pandemic, although its timing, duration, location, severity and other variables currently are unknown.
They assist health care clients with crisis management and related communications by advising on rapidly developing factual scenarios within the context of both legal obligations and employers' disaster recovery and business continuity plans.
They also assist health care clients to update emergency preparedness policies, procedures and protocols based upon evolving advice from governmental authorities and health officials on the coronavirus outbreak or pandemic.
In advising on a coronavirus outbreak or pandemic, in-house counsel will be faced with a myriad of issues that require him or her to distinguish between business and legal risks, and work with senior management to identify risk mitigation approaches to each one.
CC: What are the main challenges you face as corporate counsel of a large health care organization facing this possible epidemic or pandemic?
EB: Health care organizations need to address the increased need for patient care at the same time clinical staff may become ill and unable to work. Are plans in place to cross-train personnel to provide patient care? Have plans been established to house medical and other personnel at the facility to limit the exposure of family members to the pandemic strain? To what extent will quarantined health care personnel in their workplaces have access to basic services and care for their families?
Issues regarding patient consent to treatment may also arise involving mandatory treatment, isolation or quarantine. Federal and state statutes grant public health authorities the power to isolate or quarantine and, in some cases, order vaccinations, screenings or treatment for individuals who have contacted or been exposed to the influenza pandemic.
Is the health care organization familiar with the federal government's isolation and quarantine authority?
In particular, is the organization aware that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, through its Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, is empowered to detain, medically examine or conditionally release persons suspected of carrying certain communicable diseases?
When focusing on therapeutic measures to address coronavirus or its complications, providers will need to continue treatment of a patient's chronic co-morbid conditions. Additionally, they may need to respond to acute complications of the chronic condition that may arise in association with coronavirus and will need to consider whether and how coronavirus, and the treatments for coronavirus, may affect dosage and administration of chronic concomitant drug therapy. Anticipation of the effects of co-morbidities can lead to improved patient outcomes.
Preparing adequately for a coronavirus pandemic may require health care organizations to overcome their traditional fears of liability and address altered standards of care that may become necessary in an pandemic situation: Has the organization developed modified treatment protocols and treatment/care plans that reflect reasonably anticipated limitations in capability and are scalable based on the scope of the pandemic? Does the health care organization's research-related policies and procedures address implementation of modified standards for research and the use of investigational drugs in public health emergencies as approved by regulatory agencies?
CC: What are some of the other concerns that a chief legal officer or corporate counsel at a health care system have in this type of public health emergency?
EB: The general public seems to share a perception that all pandemic patients will receive life-sustaining technology, medications and services from health care providers. The inevitable scarcity of resources during a public health emergency will raise ethical concerns about the allocation of scarce health care resources.
During a pandemic, for example, makeshift facilities may be established to house or to treat patients; however, patients in these facilities may demand to be transferred to hospitals or other buildings that are better equipped or more comfortable.
- During a pandemic, has the health care organization considered how patients' ethical and legal rights to autonomy in treatment are affected, and how has this been communicated to both staff and patients, and their families?
- Has the health care organization established multiple lines of communication with other response agencies? Has the health care organization worked with other response agencies to clarify the relative roles of the responding agencies; specify the relative priorities of the response effort; and finally, exercise use of different communications methods, given that failures of primary communications realistically will occur?
- Has the health care organization reviewed its contracts with mission-critical vendors and suppliers to evaluate the possible impact of force majeure clauses on the ability of the organization to respond to a coronavirus pandemic?
- Has the health care organization reviewed their safety programs and emergency preparedness plans to ensure that they include updated infection disease protocols that are compliant with current [Occupational Safety and Health Administration] and state health and safety regulations?
- Has the health care organization circulated information to employees reminding them of best hygiene practices and respiratory virus infection prevention measures to counteract fear and stigma?
- Has the health care organization requested that employees limit all nonessential travel to affected regions?
CC: What are your concerns around the use of personal protective equipment such as face masks?
EB: Experts caution that using a face mask without proper fitting and training could actually increase your risk. The CDC recommends that health care workers wear a specific type of mask called a NIOSH-approved N-95 respirator, and not a surgical mask. Unlike NIOSH-approved N95s, face masks are loose-fitting and provide only barrier protection against droplets, including large respiratory particles.
I believe that it is important for a health care organization to educate its employees and patients on accepted infection control practices for coronavirus (e.g., CDC precautions for respiratory viruses) and dispel untruthful rumors about ineffective infection control practices.
Read More:
The COVID-19 Coronavirus Threat: How Can US In-House Counsel Respond?
NAIC Launches Coronavirus Resource Page
Forced Coronavirus Quarantines? Texas Appoints Judges for Emergency Hearings
Can Coronavirus Victims Sue for Injuries?
Big Firms Pitch Coronavirus Task Forces as Client Impacts Spread
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs AI Transforms Drug Development, FDA Is Scrambling to Figure Out Guardrails
5 minute readProf's Stinging Conclusion: Lawyers for Purdue Pharma Were 'Overzealous Accomplices in Corporate Misconduct'
6 minute readGC of Florida State Agency Steps Down After Threatening TV Stations That Aired Abortion-Rights Ad
CLO of Newly Public Health Care Provider Retires Without Explanation
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-59
- 2The American Lawyer Names Industry Award Winners
- 3Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
- 4Cravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
- 5Kline & Specter Hit With Lawsuit From Another Former Associate
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250