Miami Heat's Defense Against FMLA Suit: Former In-House Lawyer Was 'Toxic' and 'Disruptive'
Barbs are flying in a federal lawsuit that pits the Heat against former associate general counsel Vered Yakovee, who alleges that she was berated and ultimately fired after adopting a baby and requesting maternity leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act.
March 09, 2020 at 01:27 PM
4 minute read
The Miami Heat has launched an aggressive defense against the NBA team's former associate general counsel, who alleges she was fired for requesting maternity leave after adopting a newborn baby.
In a motion to compel arbitration filed March 6 in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, the Heat describes ex-counsel Vered Yakovee as having been a "disruptive, toxic, and sub-standard employee who single-handedly consumed more attention from human resources and senior management than any other individual employee."
The Heat also accused Yakovee of filing a "frivolous and factually deficient lawsuit" as part of an attempt to circumvent an arbitration agreement, tarnish the organization's reputation and "obtain a premature trial through press and public speculation."
The team asserts that the decision to fire Yakovee in December was based solely on her "deficient attitude, disruptive behavior" and poor job performance,
Yakovee's attorney, Erika Rotbart of Deutsch Rotbart & Associates in Boca Raton, Florida, responded to the Heat's arguments Monday.
"The Heat's allegations are not only inaccurate but yet another attempt to cast Ms. Yakovee in a poor light and are further evidence of the Heat's bad acts and continued attempts to bully my client," she wrote in an email. "We strongly believe and will show that their intentions were nothing less than discriminatory."
She added, "The media independently picked up this case and followed it from the moment it was filed—we have not sought out the press."
The Heat's attorney, Paul Ranis of Greenberg Traurig in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
At this point, the case centers on the enforceability of the Heat's arbitration agreement with Yakovee. She argues that the agreement is flawed because it contains a clause that violates the Family and Medical Leave Act by precluding an arbitrator from awarding legal costs to a prevailing plaintiff.
The Heat contends that Yakovee, in a "flagrant attempt to avoid her contractual obligations," misstates both the language of the arbitration agreement and applicable case law.
Rotbart said she and Yakovee "are confident the court will have to look at the issue of arbitration based on the legal arguments and make an appropriate determination of whether the arbitration agreement is enforceable.
"Ms. Yakovee is not an employment lawyer, and although she understands what she signed, that does not make a one-sided document enforceable," she added. "Professional women, adoptive parents, and the residents of the city of Miami should be appalled at the Heat's behavior."
Yakovee is a veteran sports law attorney who previously served as associate team counsel for the Boston Celtics, taught sports law at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law, and was editor-in-chief for the American Bar Association's entertainment and sports lawyer publication.
Her complaint names the Miami Heat organization as the sole defendant. But the team's general counsel and Yakovee's former boss, Raquel Libman, figures prominently in the allegations laid out in the complaint.
For instance, the complaint alleges that "Libman berated Ms. Yakovee and complained about her FMLA leave not only privately, but also publicly in group meetings and on group email correspondence."
And when Yakovee announced that she had adopted a baby, Libman reacted by saying, "Now I definitely won't get to take a vacation," according to the complaint.
Attempts to speak with Libman have been unsuccessful. But the Heat's recent motion to compel arbitration asserts that Yakovee mischaracterized her interactions with Libman and others at the organization.
According to the Heat, Libman supported the retroactive application of the organization's new parental leave policy, which allowed Yakovee to receive pay while on maternity leave under the FMLA.
The team also noted that Yakovee sent Libman an email in which she thanked her former boss "for your good wishes this morning when I shared my adoption news."
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
2 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readEx-Red Robin CLO Joins Norton Rose Fulbright After Helping Sell Latest Employer for $4.9 Billion
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250