Want the General Counsel to Notice You? Then Branch Out to Different Parts of the Business
"Someone who goes to SuperConference in April, takes notes, and comes back to give a CLE presentation to the entire department will get noticed," Mike Evers, founder of Evers Legal in Chicago, said. "What will stand out is that he or she did something beyond what their job usually is."
March 09, 2020 at 01:13 PM
4 minute read
Junior in-house attorneys hoping to move up in their legal departments should focus on partnering with different functions in the company and finding ways to advance legal department initiatives.
"More and more we're seeing the opportunity for junior in-house counsel to think about going beyond their individual contributions," Lauren Chung, managing director at HBR Consulting in New York, said.
|Becoming a Business Partner
In the past decade, corporate legal leaders have worked to make the legal department more welcoming to business ideas. Further, they are hoping to see their attorneys collaborate with different business functions and are listening to feedback.
Sterling Miller, senior counsel at Hilgers Graben in Dallas and former general counsel of Travelocity, said in an interview he would take note every time a manager from another department gave positive feedback on one of his attorneys.
"We're not looking for feedback on whether he or she is a good lawyer," Miller said. "Those managers are able to tell you if the attorney was practical and business-oriented."
Sterling said junior attorneys need to learn quickly the function of the legal department is to aid the business. Miller said many attorneys who come from law firms need to learn to work in "the department of 'yes.'"
"I think that is a skill that has to be developed," Miller said. "Generally lawyers are pretty conservative, especially if you come from an outside law firm."
|Beyond the Job Description
Mike Evers, the founder of Evers Legal in Chicago, said not all lawyers who go in-house immediately think of what they can do to advance the legal department. Going outside of the department for information on a new topic or trend is one way junior attorneys can be noticed by their managers.
"Someone who goes to SuperConference in April, takes notes, and comes back to give a [continuing legal education] presentation to the entire department will get noticed," Evers said. "What will stand out is that he or she did something beyond what their job usually is."
While working in-house, Miller said he was always looking to see which attorneys would be raising their hands and looking for additional responsibility.
Chung said the junior in-house attorneys who are reaching above and beyond their practice group are the ones who are getting noticed by the general counsel.
|Getting Involved in Legal Operations
An easy way to start moving beyond the job description and to see where the legal department is moving in the future is to become involved with the department's legal operations function.
The number of legal departments with a dedicated legal operations function has steadily increased over the last five years. According to the Association of Corporate Counsel's 2020 Chief Legal Officers Survey, 54% of legal departments have at least one dedicated legal operations professional. Chung said the explosion of legal operations has created a tremendous opportunity for junior in-house attorneys to drive change in the legal department.
"[Legal operations] need partnerships with the in-house lawyers to advance initiatives," Chung explained.
She said the individuals who are getting noticed are moving beyond the core legal work and helping those in operations roles on projects like technology initiatives and focus groups on outside counsel management.
|Be Patient
It is important for junior in-house attorneys to grow and learn with the legal department. It can take years before someone in a junior in-house counsel role can see a significant raise or promotion.
"Corporate legal departments value longevity from their attorneys," Chris Batz, a legal recruiter at The Lion Group in Kansas City, Missouri, said in an interview. "They find value in someone who has a willingness and hunger to learn."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Nike Promotes Legal Chief to Marketing Chief as New CEO Launches Turnaround
The FTC's Rebecca Slaughter Wants Fair Competition, and a Good Night's Sleep
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3Mass. Judge Declares Mistrial in Talc Trial: 'Court Can't Accommodate This Case'
- 4It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
- 5Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250