Wells Fargo CEO Beefs Up, Frees Up and Centralizes Compliance Efforts
Charles Scharf's testimony was part of several House hearings on the bank's efforts to comply with five government consent orders. So far, he said, there is still much work to be done.
March 10, 2020 at 06:46 PM
5 minute read
Charles Scharf, Wells Fargo & Co.'s new CEO for the past four months, told a congressional panel Tuesday that the company has centralized its compliance work, made it independent of business units and added some 3,300 people to its compliance staff.
Scharf disappointed many members of the U.S. House Committee on Financial Services by refusing to put a timeline on bringing the bank into full compliance with five government consent orders related to various scandals, including one creating millions of fake bank accounts.
"It is important that we are honest with ourselves about the scope of our challenges," Scharf said in written remarks and repeated essentially the same information in his oral testimony. "We will put all available resources toward ensuring that we operate with the strongest possible operational, risk, and control infrastructure. We are fully committed to completing all of our work, but this will take time."
He vowed that the San Francisco-based bank would "prioritize the work outlined by regulators [in the consent agreements] above all else."
His testimony was part of three House hearings, this one titled "Holding Wells Fargo Accountable: CEO Perspectives on Next Steps for the Bank That Broke America's Trust." It also was in response to the committee's scathing report released last week on Wells Fargo's failure to comply with the five consent orders since 2016.
Scharf said he is in the process of turning the bank's compliance failures around.
In an effort to change the culture, he said he has hired several key executives from outside the company and intends to hire two more. The new hires include a new chief operating officer and a new head of public affairs.
One of his two future outside hires will likely be a new general counsel. Former general counsel James Strother, who has been civilly charged by federal regulators for failing to halt phony bank accounts, retired in 2017. He is fighting the charges.
Strother's replacement, Allen Parker, is leaving at the end of this month after taking heavy criticism for moving too slowly on reforms. Wells Fargo deputy general counsel Douglas Edwards is serving as acting general counsel until Scharf names a new head of legal affairs.
In June 2018, before Scharf's arrival, Wells Fargo had already replaced chief risk officer Michael Loughlin with Amanda Norton, formerly of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Loughlin also was civilly charged by regulators and agreed to pay a $1.25 million penalty.
In January the bank hired attorney Price Sloan as chief strategic enterprise risk officer. Sloan, a financial services industry veteran with extensive legal and risk management experience, reports to Norton.
Earlier in 2018, the bank replaced its chief compliance officer, bringing in Michael Roemer from Barclays.
Scharf told the House committee that he has changed the bank's risk and compliance infrastructure. The bank historically had a decentralized, federated compliance model, with compliance staff reporting to the business units they oversaw, he said.
Now he has centralized compliance under a new position, the chief operating officer. He brought in Scott Powell, formerly CEO of Santander Holdings USA Inc., to fill the role. Powell oversees the strategic execution and operations office to provide centralized oversight and to facilitate a coordinated response to risk and compliance issues.
Powell has the authority to execute on the company's regulatory commitments, build the strongest possible operational standards and governance, and deliver consistent, high-quality customer service.
Scharf described how he also has made risk and control an independent function, reporting to the chairman of the board of directors and participating in the bank's operating committee. There is still a tier of risk officers embedded in the businesses, he said, but they no longer report to those business units.
Scharf spoke often of "urgency" with respect to compliance measures, and of doing what is right by customers.
In her opening statement, committee chairwoman Maxine Waters called Wells Fargo "a lawless organization that has caused widespread harm to millions of consumers throughout the nation."
Waters and other panel members tried to push Scharf to commit to specific remediation measures for harmed consumers, but he would say only, "I assure you that we will complete all remediation of customers we have harmed."
Others pushed for commitments such as not to lend to gun manufacturers, or not to take on any new acquisitions, or to raise minimum pay across the board, or to withhold dividend payments until the economic threats from the coronavirus have passed. But again he promised only to look at their issues.
The next hearing, "Holding Wells Fargo Accountable: Examining the Role of the Board of Directors in the Bank's Egregious Patter of Consumer Abuses," is scheduled to start 10 a.m. Wednesday.
Scheduled witnesses are Elizabeth "Betsy" Duke, former board chairwoman, and board member James Quigley. Both Duke and Quigley resigned Monday in the wake of the House report when Waters called for their resignations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute read'We’re Here to Empower People to Make Good Decisions': Why Compliance Chiefs Must Learn to Think Like a Businessperson
Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
Trending Stories
- 1NY High Court Returns Fired Priest's Discrimination Claim to State Agency
- 2Digging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
- 3Reminder: Court Rules and Statutes Apply to Pendente Lite Custody Decisions
- 4Consumer Cleared to Proceed With Claims Against CVS 'Non-Drowsy' Medication, Judge Says
- 5Ex-Schnader Partner Nears Settlement in Misappropriated Comp Class Action
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250