Immuta Chief Legal Officer Joins Data Scientist to Create Boutique AI Law Firm
"I am under the belief that the biggest barriers [to artificial intelligence] are not technical. They all arise in the form of liability. I see this joint partnership as one largely helping companies manage liability," Andrew Burt, managing partner at BNH.AI, explained.
March 19, 2020 at 10:03 AM
4 minute read
The chief legal officer of Immuta and a career data scientist are now in the business of helping companies understand the technical and legal risks of using artificial intelligence.
Immuta's Andrew Burt partnered with Patrick Hall, who spent much of his career developing artificial intelligence platforms, to create the Washington, D.C.-based BNH.AI.
"Patrick and I have spent the last several years involved in the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence," said Burt, who is managing partner of the firm.
Burt explained that companies have had issues in the past of bringing in the right lawyer with the right technologist to fill the gaps in artificial intelligence implementation. He said that is where BNH.AI can show its value.
With artificial intelligence implementation, there are issues in which only technologists and data scientists can find solutions. Hall, the principal scientist at BNH.AI, explained the most difficult, though fixable, include algorithmic discrimination and transparency. Hall said, because of research over the past couple of years and open source software, many of those issues can be easily fixed.
"I can help mitigate risk and discrimination," Hall explained. "The question that is left is: 'Is this legal?'"
There are no laws on the federal level governing the use of artificial intelligence yet. However, there are state and local municipality laws governing its usage. Last year, Illinois lawmakers passed the Illinois Video Interview Act, which requires employers to notify applicants that artificial intelligence is being used to analyze the interview. Burt and Hall said new legislation on artificial intelligence will be passed in the future.
"I like to bring up the example that the Dutch government shut down a machine learning system for the first time," Hall said. "That is important because some of the companies we work with may be international and those regulations could make their way to the U.S."
Burt said companies also need to consider how data is used in artificial intelligence and any data privacy laws that impact their business.
"I am under the belief that the biggest barriers [to artificial intelligence] are not technical. They all arise in the form of liability. I see this joint partnership as one largely helping companies manage liability," Burt explained.
Clients and Size
Hall and Burt did not name specific clients they've worked with during the first weeks of the firm. They did say their clients range from small companies to "extremely large corporations."
"The one thing they have in common is that they're well into the process of investing in AI," Burt explained. "They're starting to realize there is a growing list of liabilities from all of these investments."
Burt said they plan on expanding the number of employees, both attorneys and data scientists, organically.
"We want to be boutique and a source of concentrated expertise," Burt said. "For now, our focus is on helping organizations understand these issues."
Location Matters
Burt, who will remain CLO at Immuta, said the firm has to be based in Washington, D.C. because it is the only place in the country where nonattorneys can partially own a law firm.
The District of Columbia Bar's Rule 5.4(B) states "a lawyer may practice law in a partnership or other form of organization in which a financial interest is held or managerial authority is exercised by an individual nonlawyer who performs professional services which assist the organization in providing legal services to clients."
The strategic advantage of being in D.C., he explained, is being close to where national data privacy and artificial intelligence laws are created.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
InCloudCounsel Hires First GC to Continue Expansion in Asia
Trending Stories
- 1Eckert Seamans Sues Former Client Over $300K in Unpaid Legal Fees
- 2Federal Judge Rejects Teams' Challenge to NASCAR's 'Anticompetitive Terms' in Agreement
- 3Ben & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
- 4Gold Medal Grift? Caitlyn Jenner Accused in Crypto Fraud Scheme
- 5Jay Clayton, Ex-SEC Chief and Sullivan & Cromwell Lawyer, Eyed For Manhattan US Attorney's Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250